Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23631916›Full record

ArticlemBio2013

Cell host response to infection with novel human coronavirus EMC predicts potential antivirals and important differences with SARS coronavirus.

Laurence Josset, Vineet D Menachery, Lisa E Gralinski, Sudhakar Agnihothram, Pavel Sova, Victoria S Carter, Boyd L Yount, Rachel L Graham, Ralph S Baric, Michael G Katze

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in mBio, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 205 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
205citing papers in PubMed
13.9field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

205 citing papers in PubMed, 310 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Rationale for Use of Sphingosine-1-Phosphate Receptor Modulators in COVID-19 Patients: Overview of Scientific Evidence.Journal of interferon & cytokine research : the official journal of the International Society for Interferon and Cytokine Research · 2023
    Review
  20. Screening and identification of potential MERS-CoV papain-like protease (PLpro) inhibitors; Steady-state kinetic and Molecular dynamic studies.Saudi pharmaceutical journal : SPJ : the official publication of the Saudi Pharmaceutical Society · 2023
    Article

145 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Laurence JossetDepartment of Microbiology, School of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA.
Vineet D Menachery
Lisa E Gralinski
Sudhakar Agnihothram
Pavel Sova
Victoria S Carter
Boyd L Yount
Rachel L Graham
Ralph S Baric
Michael G Katze
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill · USUniversity of Washington · US

Funding

The Burden of Chikungunya and Dengue Infection in KenyaU54AI081680 · NIAID · OREGON HEALTH & SCIENCE UNIVERSITY · PI RYMAN, KATHERINE D · 2009 to 2013
$40.4M
Unlocking Zika Virus Immune Control and Pathogenesis with the Collaborative CrossU19AI100625 · NIAID · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI HEISE, MARK T · 2012 to 2021
$36.6M
NIAID NIH HHS HHSN272200800060CNIAID NIH HHS U19 AI100625NIAID NIH HHS U54 AI081680NIAID NIH HHS U54AI081680
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

unlabelledA novel human coronavirus (HCoV-EMC) was recently identified in the Middle East as the causative agent of a severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) resembling the illness caused by SARS coronavirus (SARS-CoV). Although derived from the CoV family, the two viruses are genetically distinct and do not use the same receptor. Here, we investigated whether HCoV-EMC and SARS-CoV induce similar or distinct host responses after infection of a human lung epithelial cell line. HCoV-EMC was able to replicate as efficiently as SARS-CoV in Calu-3 cells and similarly induced minimal transcriptomic changes before 12 h postinfection. Later in infection, HCoV-EMC induced a massive dysregulation of the host transcriptome, to a much greater extent than SARS-CoV. Both viruses induced a similar activation of pattern recognition receptors and the interleukin 17 (IL-17) pathway, but HCoV-EMC specifically down-regulated the expression of several genes within the antigen presentation pathway, including both type I and II major histocompatibility complex (MHC) genes. This could have an important impact on the ability of the host to mount an adaptive host response. A unique set of 207 genes was dysregulated early and permanently throughout infection with HCoV-EMC, and was used in a computational screen to predict potential antiviral compounds, including kinase inhibitors and glucocorticoids. Overall, HCoV-EMC and SARS-CoV elicit distinct host gene expression responses, which might impact in vivo pathogenesis and could orient therapeutic strategies against that emergent virus. IMPORTANCE: Identification of a novel coronavirus causing fatal respiratory infection in humans raises concerns about a possible widespread outbreak of severe respiratory infection similar to the one caused by SARS-CoV. Using a human lung epithelial cell line and global transcriptomic profiling, we identified differences in the host response between HCoV-EMC and SARS-CoV. This enables rapid assessment of viral properties and the ability to anticipate possible differences in human clinical responses to HCoV-EMC and SARS-CoV. We used this information to predict potential effective drugs against HCoV-EMC, a method that could be more generally used to identify candidate therapeutics in future disease outbreaks. These data will help to generate hypotheses and make rapid advancements in characterizing this new virus.

Indexed as

Host-Pathogen InteractionsCell LineCoronavirusEpithelial CellsHumansImmune ToleranceSevere Acute Respiratory SyndromeTranscriptomeVirus Replication

Identifiers

PMID23631916
PMCPMC3663187
OpenAlexW2016921919

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.