Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23631864›Full record

ArticleExperimental neurology2013

SN79, a sigma receptor ligand, blocks methamphetamine-induced microglial activation and cytokine upregulation.

Matthew J Robson, Ryan C Turner, Zachary J Naser, Christopher R McCurdy, Jason D Huber, Rae R Matsumoto

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Experimental neurology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 39 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
39citing papers in PubMed
3.4field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

39 citing papers in PubMed, 61 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Role of Microglia in Psychostimulant Addiction.Current neuropharmacology · 2023
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Matthew J RobsonDepartment of Basic Pharmaceutical Sciences, School of Pharmacy, West Virginia University, 1 Medical Center Dr., West Virginia University Health Sciences Center, Morgantown, WV 26506, USA.
Ryan C Turner
Zachary J Naser
Christopher R McCurdy
Jason D Huber
Rae R Matsumoto
West Virginia University · USUniversity of Mississippi · US

Funding

Research Training Program in the Behavioral and Biomedical SciencesT32GM081741 · NIGMS · WEST VIRGINIA UNIVERSITY · PI BERREBI, ALBERT S, SIMPKINS, JAMES W. · 2008 to 2018
$2.1M
Synthesis &Evaluation of Cocaine AntagonistsR01DA013978 · NIDA · WEST VIRGINIA UNIVERSITY · PI MATSUMOTO, RAE R · 2001 to 2010
$1.9M
Novel Pharmacologic Interventions for Drugs of AbuseR01DA023205 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF MISSISSIPPI · PI MCCURDY, CHRISTOPHER R · 2007 to 2011
$1.7M
Age influences neuropoietic signaling at the neurovascular unit following strokeR01NS061954 · NINDS · WEST VIRGINIA UNIVERSITY · PI HUBER, JASON D · 2008 to 2012
$1.7M
NIDA NIH HHS DA013978NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA013978NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA023205NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM081741NINDS NIH HHS NS061954NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS061954PHS HHS D023205
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Methamphetamine (METH) abuse is associated with several negative side effects including neurotoxicity in specific brain regions such as the striatum. The precise molecular mechanisms by which METH usage results in neurotoxicity remain to be fully elucidated, with recent evidence implicating the importance of microglial activation and neuroinflammation in damaged brain regions. METH interacts with sigma receptors which are found in glial cells in addition to neurons. Moreover, sigma receptor antagonists have been shown to block METH-induced neurotoxicity in rodents although the cellular mechanisms underlying their neuroprotection remain unknown. The purpose of the current study was to determine if the prototypic sigma receptor antagonist, SN79, mitigates METH-induced microglial activation and associated increases in cytokine expression in a rodent model of METH-induced neurotoxicity. METH increased striatal mRNA and protein levels of cluster of differentiation 68 (CD68), indicative of microglial activation. METH also increased ionized calcium binding adapter molecule 1 (IBA-1) protein expression, further confirming the activation of microglia. Along with microglial activation, METH increased striatal mRNA expression levels of IL-6 family pro-inflammatory cytokines, leukemia inhibitory factor (lif), oncostatin m (osm), and interleukin-6 (il-6). Pretreatment with SN79 reduced METH-induced increases in CD68 and IBA-1 expression, demonstrating its ability to prevent microglial activation. SN79 also attenuated METH-induced mRNA increases in IL-6 pro-inflammatory cytokine family members. The ability of a sigma receptor antagonist to block METH-induced microglial activation and cytokine production provides a novel mechanism through which the neurotoxic effects of METH may be mitigated.

Indexed as

Analysis of VarianceAnimalsAntigens, CDAntigens, Differentiation, MyelomonocyticBenzoxazolesBody TemperatureBrainCD68 MoleculeCytokinesMaleMethamphetamineMiceMicrogliaPiperazinesReceptors, sigmaRNA, Messenger6-acetyl-3-(4-(4-(4-fluorophenyl)piperazin-1-yl)butyl)benzo(d)oxazol-2(3H)-oneAntigens, CDAntigens, Differentiation, MyelomonocyticBenzoxazolesCD68 antigen, humanCD68 MoleculeCytokinesMethamphetaminePiperazinesReceptors, sigmaRNA, MessengerCytokineMethamphetamineMicroglial activationNeurotoxicitySigma receptor

Identifiers

PMID23631864
PMCPMC3742718
OpenAlexW1997962806

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.