ArticleAnalytical chemistry2013
Assessing the stochastic intermittency of single quantum dot luminescence for robust quantification of biomolecules.
Article in Analytical chemistry, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Single molecule detection schemes promise that one has the ability to reach the ultimate limit of detection: one molecule. In this paper, we use the stochastic luminescence of single semiconductor nanocrystals (quantum dots, QDs) to detect and localize particles as digital counts. These digital counts can be correlated to the concentration of analytes in solution. Here, we use total internal reflection fluorescence (TIRF) microscopy to probe individual QDs immobilized on a functionalized substrate. QDs have found their niche in the bioanalytical community due to their remarkable brightness and stability. Despite their numerous outstanding photophysical properties, QDs at the single particle level display a pronounced intermittent luminescence, posing a challenge for the detection of individual particles. In this paper, we demonstrate a reliable method for detecting QDs that takes advantage of these signal fluctuations by comparing the variations in the QD's fluorescence signals against variations of the background signal. The quantitative methodology developed here results in signal-to-background ratios up to 90:1, which is at least 8-times higher than the ratios obtained using methodologies relying solely on signal integration. This enhanced signal-to-background ratio facilitates a robust thresholding process and results in femtomolar limits of detection.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.