ArticleBMC infectious diseases2013
Improvement in process of care and outcome in patients requiring intensive care unit admission for community acquired pneumonia.
Article in BMC infectious diseases, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 22 citations in OpenAlex.
- Predictors of mortality in severe pneumonia patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Systematic reviews · 2024Pooled it
- Prognosis of liver abscess in the intensive care unit (POLAIR), a multicentre observational study.Critical care (London, England) · 2025Observational
- Care bundles for improving outcomes in patients with COVID-19 or related conditions in intensive care - a rapid scoping review.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2020Article
- PES Pathogens in Severe Community-Acquired Pneumonia.Microorganisms · 2019Review
- Twenty-year trend in mortality among hospitalized patients with pneumococcal community-acquired pneumonia.PloS one · 2018Observational
- Severe community-acquired pneumonia: timely management measures in the first 24 hours.Critical care (London, England) · 2016Review
- In-hospital mortality following treatment with red blood cell transfusion or inotropic therapy during early goal-directed therapy for septic shock: a retrospective propensity-adjusted analysis.Critical care (London, England) · 2014Article
- Quality improvement in hospital management of community-acquired pneumonia: focus on new strategies and current challenges.Current infectious disease reports · 2014Article
- [Which samples to obtain in the emergency department for the microbiological diagnosis of community-acquired pneumonia in the immunocompetent patient?]Reanimation : journal de la Societe de reanimation de langue francaise · 2014Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe present study was performed to assess the prognosis of patients admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) for community acquired pneumonia (CAP) after implementation of new processes of care.
methodsTwo groups of patients with CAP were admitted to a 16-bed multidisciplinary ICU in an urban teaching hospital during two different periods: the years 1995-2000, corresponding to the historical group; and 2005-2010, corresponding to the intervention group. New therapeutic procedures were implemented during the period 2005-2010. These procedures included a sepsis management bundle derived from the Surviving Sepsis Campaign, use of a third-generation cephalosporin and levofloxacin as the initial empirical antimicrobial regimen, and noninvasive mechanical ventilation following extubation.
resultsA total of 317 patients were studied: 142 (44.8%) during the historical period and 175 (55.2%) during the intervention period. Sequential Organ Failure Assessment scores were higher in patients in the intervention group (7.2 ± 3.7 vs 6.2 ± 2.8; p=0.008). Mortality changed significantly between the two studied periods, decreasing from 43.6% in the historical group to 30.9% in the intervention group (p < 0.02). A restrictive transfusion strategy, use of systematic postextubation noninvasive mechanical ventilation in patients with severe chronic respiratory or cardiac failure patients, less frequent use of dobutamine and/or epinephrine in patients with sepsis or septic shock, and delivery of a third-generation cephalosporin associated with levofloxacin as empirical antimicrobial therapy were independently associated with better outcomes.
conclusionPositive outcomes in ICU patients with CAP have significantly increased in our ICU in recent years. Many new interventions have contributed to this improvement.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.