Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23631445›Full record

ReviewBMC medical ethics2013

Bariatric surgery for obese children and adolescents: a review of the moral challenges.

Bjørn Hofmann

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in BMC medical ethics, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
10.4field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 63 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. A comprehensive review of genetic causes of obesity.World journal of pediatrics : WJP · 2024
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Development and application of an ethical framework for pediatric metabolic and bariatric surgery evaluation.Surgery for obesity and related diseases : official journal of the American Society for Bariatric Surgery · 2021
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Novel Insights into the Pathogenesis and Management of the Metabolic Syndrome.Pediatric gastroenterology, hepatology & nutrition · 2020
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. ASMBS pediatric metabolic and bariatric surgery guidelines, 2018.Surgery for obesity and related diseases : official journal of the American Society for Bariatric Surgery · 2018
    Review
  15. Health Disparities in Adolescent Bariatric Surgery: Nationwide Outcomes and Utilization.The Journal of adolescent health : official publication of the Society for Adolescent Medicine · 2017
    Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Physical activity and health in adolescence.Clinical medicine (London, England) · 2015
    Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Bjørn HofmannSection for Health, Technology, and Society, University College of Gjøvik, PO Box 191, Gjøvik, N-2802, Norway. b.m.hofmann@medisin.uio.no
Ko-Aks (Norway) · NO

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundBariatric surgery for children and adolescents is becoming widespread. However, the evidence is still scarce and of poor quality, and many of the patients are too young to consent. This poses a series of moral challenges, which have to be addressed both when considering bariatric surgery introduced as a health care service and when deciding for treatment for young individuals. A question based (Socratic) approach is applied to reveal underlying moral issues that can be relevant to an open and transparent decision making process. DISCUSSION: A wide range of moral issues with bariatric surgery for children and adolescents is identified in the literature. There is a moral imperative to help obese minors avoiding serious health problems, but there is little high quality evidence on safety, outcomes, and cost-effectiveness for bariatric surgery in this group. Lack of maturity and family relations poses a series of challenges with autonomy, informed consent, assent, and assessing the best interest of children and adolescents. Social aspects of obesity, such as medicalization, prejudice, and discrimination, raise problems with justice and trust in health professionals. Conceptual issues, such as definition of obesity and treatment end-points, present moral problems. Hidden interests of patients, parents, professionals, industry, and society need to be revealed. SUMMARY: Performing bariatric surgery for obese children and adolescents in order to discipline their behavior warrants reflection and caution. More evidence on outcomes is needed to be able to balance benefits and risks, to provide information for a valid consent or assent, and to advise minors and parents.

Indexed as

MoralsAdolescentBariatric SurgeryBeautyBeneficenceBody ImageChildComorbidityComprehensionEatingFemaleFoodHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHealth Services AccessibilityHumansInformed Consent By Minors

Identifiers

PMID23631445
PMCPMC3655839
OpenAlexW2099162658

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.