Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23630451›Full record

ArticlePLoS biology2013

An introduction to social media for scientists.

Holly M Bik, Miriam C Goldstein

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS biology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 81 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
81citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

81 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Our changing information ecosystem for science and why it matters for effective science communication.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Tree-Climbing Behavior of a Forest-Dwelling Ungulate: The Formosan Serow.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2024
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Twitter trends in #Parasitology determined by text mining and topic modelling.Current research in parasitology & vector-borne diseases · 2023
    Article
  19. Article
  20. African Swine Fever-How to Unravel Fake News in Veterinary Medicine.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2022
    Article

21 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Holly M BikUC Davis Genome Center, University of California Davis, Davis, California, USA. holly.bik@gmail.com
Miriam C Goldstein

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Online social media tools can be some of the most rewarding and informative resources for scientists-IF you know how to use them.

Indexed as

Congresses as TopicHumansLaboratory PersonnelSocial MediaSocial NetworkingSoftware

Identifiers

PMID23630451
PMCPMC3635859

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.