Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23630166›Full record

ArticleClinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research2013

Prolonged inhibition of glioblastoma xenograft initiation and clonogenic growth following in vivo Notch blockade.

Qian Chu, Brent A Orr, Samantha Semenkow, Eli E Bar, Charles G Eberhart

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Notch signaling pathway: architecture, disease, and therapeutics.Signal transduction and targeted therapy · 2022
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Qian ChuDepartment of Oncology, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical School, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China.
Brent A Orr
Samantha Semenkow
Eli E Bar
Charles G Eberhart

Funding

TRAINING PROGRAM IN THE PATHOBIOLOGY OF CANCERT32CA067751 · NCI · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI GABRIELSON, EDWARD W. · 1996 to 2011
$4.0M
Notch signaling in brain tumorsR01NS055089 · NINDS · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI EBERHART, CHARLES G · 2007 to 2016
$3.2M
Effectively Targeting Notch in Hypoxic Brain Tumor CellsR56NS055089 · NINDS · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI EBERHART, CHARLES G · 2012 to 2012
$405k
NCI NIH HHS T32 CA067751NCI NIH HHS T32CA067751NINDS NIH HHS NS055089NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS055089NINDS NIH HHS R56 NS055089
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo examine the effects of clinically relevant pharmacologic Notch inhibition on glioblastoma xenografts. EXPERIMENTAL

designMurine orthotopic xenografts generated from temozolomide-sensitive and -resistant glioblastoma neurosphere lines were treated with the γ-secretase inhibitor MRK003. Tumor growth was tracked by weekly imaging, and the effects on animal survival and tumor proliferation were assessed, along with the expression of Notch targets, stem cell, and differentiation markers, and the biology of neurospheres isolated from previously treated xenografts and controls.

resultsWeekly MRK003 therapy resulted in significant reductions in growth as measured by imaging, as well as prolongation of survival. Microscopic examination confirmed a statistically significant reduction in cross-sectional tumor area and mitotic index in a MRK003-treated cohort as compared with controls. Expression of multiple Notch targets was reduced in the xenografts, along with neural stem/progenitor cell markers, whereas glial differentiation was induced. Neurospheres derived from MRK003-treated xenografts exhibited reduced clonogenicity and formed less aggressive secondary xenografts. Neurospheres isolated from treated xenografts remained sensitive to MRK003, suggesting that therapeutic resistance does not rapidly arise during in vivo Notch blockade.

conclusionsWeekly oral delivery of MRK003 results in significant in vivo inhibition of Notch pathway activity, tumor growth, stem cell marker expression, and clonogenicity, providing preclinical support for the use of such compounds in patients with malignant brain tumors. Some of these effects can persist for some time after in vivo therapy is complete.

Indexed as

Amyloid Precursor Protein SecretasesAnimalsCell ProliferationCyclic S-OxidesDacarbazineDrug Resistance, NeoplasmGene Expression Regulation, NeoplasticGlioblastomaHumansMaleMiceReceptors, NotchSignal TransductionTemozolomideThiadiazolesXenograft Model Antitumor AssaysAmyloid Precursor Protein SecretasesCyclic S-OxidesDacarbazineMRK 003Receptors, NotchTemozolomideThiadiazoles

Identifiers

PMID23630166
PMCPMC3686970

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.