ArticleJournal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine2013
Evaluation of the Genisys4, a bench-top preclinical PET scanner.
Article in Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 34 citations in OpenAlex.
- First performance evaluation of easyPET.3D, a high-resolution and cost-effective benchtop preclinical PET scanner.EJNMMI physics · 2025Article
- Novel positron emission tomography imaging targeting cell surface glycans for pancreatic cancer:Cancer science · 2023Article
- Sensors for Positron Emission Tomography Applications.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2019Review
- Performance Evaluation of G8, a High-Sensitivity Benchtop Preclinical PET/CT Tomograph.Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine · 2019Article
- Preclinical evaluation of PSMA expression in response to androgen receptor blockade for theranostics in prostate cancer.EJNMMI research · 2018Article
- Depicting Changes in Tumor Biology in Response to Cetuximab Monotherapy or Combination Therapy by Apoptosis and Proliferation Imaging UsingJournal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine · 2018Article
- Standardization of Small Animal Imaging-Current Status and Future Prospects.Molecular imaging and biology · 2018Review
- Detection Threshold and Reproducibility ofJournal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine · 2018Article
- EstablishingJournal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine · 2017Article
- Preclinical in vivo application of (152)Tb-DOTANOC: a radiolanthanide for PET imaging.EJNMMI research · 2016Article
- Advances in PET Detection of the Antitumor T Cell Response.Advances in immunology · 2016Review
- Accurate molecular imaging of small animals taking into account animal models, handling, anaesthesia, quality control and imaging system performance.EJNMMI physics · 2015Article
- Single-cell tracking with PET using a novel trajectory reconstruction algorithm.IEEE transactions on medical imaging · 2015Article
- Preclinical imaging: an essential ally in modern biosciences.Molecular diagnosis & therapy · 2014Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
unlabelledThe Genisys4 is a small bench-top preclinical PET scanner designed to enable imaging in biology, biochemistry, and pharmacology laboratories and imaging centers. Here, we compare its performance with that of a well-established preclinical PET scanner.
methodsSubcutaneous and lung tumor xenografts were used to compare lesion detectability and treatment responses to chemotherapy (gemcitabine) using (18)F-FDG PET. The size of subcutaneous xenografts (L1210 and L1210-10K leukemia cells) and lung metastases (B-16 melanoma cells) was measured on small-animal CT images. Tumor (18)F-FDG uptake was expressed as percentage injected dose per gram. Using list-mode data, serial images of the left ventricular blood pool were used to generate time-activity curves.
resultsSubcutaneous xenografts (range, 4-12 mm; mean ± SD, 6.1 ± 1.7 mm) and lung metastases (range, 1-5 mm; mean, 2.1 ± 1.2 mm) were detected equally well with both scanners. Tumor (18)F-FDG uptake measured with both scanners was highly correlated for subcutaneous xenografts (r(2) = 0.93) and lung metastases (r(2) = 0.83). The new Genisys4 scanner and the established scanner provided comparable treatment response information (r(2) = 0.93). Dynamic imaging sequences permitted the generation of left ventricular blood-pool time-activity curves with both scanners.
conclusionUsing subcutaneous and lung xenografts, a novel and an established preclinical PET scanner provided equivalent information with regard to lesion detection, tumor (18)F-FDG uptake, tumor response to treatment, and generation of time-activity curves. Thus, the Genisys4 provides a small, efficient bench-top preclinical PET alternative for quantitatively studying murine tumor models in biology, biochemistry, and pharmacology laboratories and preclinical imaging centers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.