Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23628700›Full record

ArticleJournal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine2013

Evaluation of the Genisys4, a bench-top preclinical PET scanner.

Ken Herrmann, Magnus Dahlbom, David Nathanson, Liu Wei, Caius Radu, Arion Chatziioannou, Johannes Czernin

Open access · bronzeAbstract readEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
4.2field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 34 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Sensors for Positron Emission Tomography Applications.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2019
    Review
  4. Performance Evaluation of G8, a High-Sensitivity Benchtop Preclinical PET/CT Tomograph.Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine · 2019
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Detection Threshold and Reproducibility ofJournal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine · 2018
    Article
  9. EstablishingJournal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine · 2017
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Ken HerrmannAhmanson Translational Imaging Division, Department of Molecular and Medical Pharmacology, David Geffen School of Medicine, UCLA, Los Angeles, California 90095-1782, USA.
Magnus Dahlbom
David Nathanson
Liu Wei
Caius Radu
Arion Chatziioannou
Johannes Czernin
University of California, Los Angeles · USInstitute for Molecular Medicine · USUniversitätsklinikum Würzburg · DE

Funding

Transductionally Redirected /Transcriptionally RestricteP50CA086306 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI HERSCHMAN, HARVEY R. · 2000 to 2014
$29.0M
UCLA Scholars in Oncologic Molecular lmaging (SOMI)R25CA098010 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI PHELPS, MICHAEL E · 2003 to 2013
$5.0M
NCI NIH HHS P50 CA086306NCI NIH HHS R25 CA098010
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

unlabelledThe Genisys4 is a small bench-top preclinical PET scanner designed to enable imaging in biology, biochemistry, and pharmacology laboratories and imaging centers. Here, we compare its performance with that of a well-established preclinical PET scanner.

methodsSubcutaneous and lung tumor xenografts were used to compare lesion detectability and treatment responses to chemotherapy (gemcitabine) using (18)F-FDG PET. The size of subcutaneous xenografts (L1210 and L1210-10K leukemia cells) and lung metastases (B-16 melanoma cells) was measured on small-animal CT images. Tumor (18)F-FDG uptake was expressed as percentage injected dose per gram. Using list-mode data, serial images of the left ventricular blood pool were used to generate time-activity curves.

resultsSubcutaneous xenografts (range, 4-12 mm; mean ± SD, 6.1 ± 1.7 mm) and lung metastases (range, 1-5 mm; mean, 2.1 ± 1.2 mm) were detected equally well with both scanners. Tumor (18)F-FDG uptake measured with both scanners was highly correlated for subcutaneous xenografts (r(2) = 0.93) and lung metastases (r(2) = 0.83). The new Genisys4 scanner and the established scanner provided comparable treatment response information (r(2) = 0.93). Dynamic imaging sequences permitted the generation of left ventricular blood-pool time-activity curves with both scanners.

conclusionUsing subcutaneous and lung xenografts, a novel and an established preclinical PET scanner provided equivalent information with regard to lesion detection, tumor (18)F-FDG uptake, tumor response to treatment, and generation of time-activity curves. Thus, the Genisys4 provides a small, efficient bench-top preclinical PET alternative for quantitatively studying murine tumor models in biology, biochemistry, and pharmacology laboratories and preclinical imaging centers.

Indexed as

AnimalsCell Line, TumorEquipment DesignEquipment Failure AnalysisMiceMice, SCIDMiniaturizationNeoplasms, ExperimentalPositron-Emission TomographyReproducibility of ResultsSensitivity and Specificity18F-FDGpreclinical PETscanner performancetumor models

Identifiers

PMID23628700
PMCPMC3790646
OpenAlexW2158340306

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.