Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23628591›Full record

ArticleHealth promotion practice2014

Using peer crowds to segment Black youth for smoking intervention.

Youn Ok Lee, Jeffery W Jordan, Mayo Djakaria, Pamela M Ling

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health promotion practice, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Mapping of Crowdsourcing in Health: Systematic Review.Journal of medical Internet research · 2018
    Pooled it
  2. Young Adult Responses to Peer Crowd-Based Targeting in E-cigarette Advertisements: An Experimental Study.Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco · 2023
    Trial
  3. Awareness of and Receptivity to the Fresh Empire Tobacco Public Education Campaign Among Hip Hop Youth.The Journal of adolescent health : official publication of the Society for Adolescent Medicine · 2020
    Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Reach, Receptivity, And Beliefs Associated With theAmerican journal of health promotion : AJHP · 2022
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Youn Ok LeeRTI International, Research Triangle Park, NC, USA younlee@rti.org.
Jeffery W JordanRescue Social Change Group, San Diego, CA, USA.
Mayo DjakariaRescue Social Change Group, San Diego, CA, USA.
Pamela M LingUniversity of California, San Francisco, CA, USA.

Funding

TREATMENTS FOR COMPLEX PATIENTS IN NEW SETTINGSP50DA009253 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI SORENSEN, JAMES L · 1994 to 2014
$28.2M
Countering Young Adult Tobacco Marketing in BarsU01CA154240 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI LING, PAMELA MAY · 2011 to 2015
$6.1M
Postdoctoral training in tobacco controlR25CA113710 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI GLANTZ, STANTON ARNOLD · 2006 to 2015
$5.4M
Postdoctoral training in tobacco controlT32CA113710 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI LING, PAMELA MAY · 2016 to 2020
$2.6M
NCI NIH HHS CA-113710NCI NIH HHS R25 CA113710NCI NIH HHS T32 CA113710NCI NIH HHS U01 CA154240NIDA NIH HHS P50 DA009253PHS HHS U01-154240
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Studies of peer crowds show promise for enhancing public health promotion and practice through targeting. Distinct images, role models, and social norms likely influence health behaviors of different peer crowds within health disparity groups. We describe peer crowds identified by Black young people and determine whether identification with them is associated with smoking. Data from Black young people aged 13 to 20 years in Richmond, Virginia, were collected via interview and online survey (N = 583). We identified the number and type of peer crowds using principal components analysis; associations with smoking were analyzed using Pearson chi-square tests and logistic regression. Three peer crowds were identified--"preppy," "mainstream," and "hip hop." Youth who identify with the hip hop peer crowd were more likely to smoke and have friends who smoke and less likely to hold antitobacco attitudes than those identifying with preppy or mainstream crowds. Identifying with the hip hop crowd significantly increased the odds of smoking, controlling for demographic factors (odds ratio = 1.97; 95% confidence interval = 1.03-3.76). Tobacco prevention efforts for Black youth and young adults should prioritize the hip hop crowd. Crowd identity measures can aid in targeting public health campaigns to effectively engage those at highest risk.

Indexed as

Peer GroupSmoking PreventionAdolescentBlack or African AmericanFemaleHealth BehaviorHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHealth PromotionHumansMaleSmokingSocioeconomic FactorsVirginiaYoung Adultdisparitiesidentityinterventionracesmokingyoung adultsyouth

Identifiers

PMID23628591
PMCPMC3795790

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.