Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23628144›Full record

ArticleBMC musculoskeletal disorders2013

Prevalence of claims-based recurrent low back pain in a Canadian population: a secondary analysis of an administrative database.

Nicolas Beaudet, Josiane Courteau, Philippe Sarret, Alain Vanasse

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC musculoskeletal disorders, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Prevalence of lumbar spinal stenosis in general and clinical populations: a systematic review and meta-analysis.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2020
    Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. What is manipulation? A new definition.BMC musculoskeletal disorders · 2023
    Review
  7. Profile of individuals with low back pain and factors defining chronicity of pain: a population-based study in Ethiopia.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2022
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Identifying cases of chronic pain using health administrative data: A validation study.Canadian journal of pain = Revue canadienne de la douleur · 2020
    Article
  10. Low Back Pain in Adults With Transfemoral Amputation: A Retrospective Population-Based Study.PM & R : the journal of injury, function, and rehabilitation · 2019
    Article
  11. Observational
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Nicolas BeaudetThe PRIMUS Group, Clinical Research Centre Etienne-Lebel, CHUS, Sherbrooke, Quebec, Canada.
Josiane Courteau
Philippe Sarret
Alain Vanasse

Funding

Canadian Institutes of Health Research
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThere is a vast literature reporting that the point prevalence of low back pain (LBP) is high and increasing. It is also known that a large proportion of acute LBP episodes are recurrent within 12 months. However, few studies report the annual trends in the prevalence of recurrent LBP or describe these trends according to age and sex categories.

methodsWe conducted a retrospective cohort study involving 401 264 adults selected from the administrative database of physician claims for the province of Quebec, Canada. These adults, aged 18 years and over, met the criteria of having consulted a physician three times within a 365-day period between 2000 and 2007 for a LBP condition corresponding to ICD-9 codes 721, 722, 724 or 739. All data were analyzed by sex and clustered according to specific age categories.

resultsWe observed a decrease from 1.64% to 1.33% in the annual prevalence between 2000 and 2007 for men. This decrease in prevalence was mostly observed between 35 and 59 years of age. Older (≥ 65 years) women were 1.35 times more at risk to consult a physician for LBP in a recurrent manner than older men. The most frequently reported diagnosis was non-specific LBP between 2000 to 2007. During the same period, sequelae of previous back surgery and spinal stenosis were the categories with the largest increases.

conclusionThe annual prevalence of claims-based recurrent LBP progressively decreased between 2000 and 2007 for younger adults (<65 years) while older adults (≥ 65 years) showed an increase. Given the aging Canadian population, recurrent low back pain could have an increasing impact on the quality of life of the elderly as well as on the healthcare system.

Indexed as

AdultCanadaCohort StudiesDatabases, FactualFemaleHumansInsurance Claim ReviewInternational Classification of DiseasesLow Back PainMaleMiddle AgedPrevalenceQuebecRetrospective Studies

Identifiers

PMID23628144
PMCPMC3644493

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.