Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23626906›Full record

ArticleBMJ supportive & palliative care2013

Development and evaluation of an aged care specific Advance Care Plan.

William Silvester, Ruth A Parslow, Virginia J Lewis, Rachael S Fullam, Rebekah Sjanta, Lynne Jackson, Vanessa White, Rosalie Hudson

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ supportive & palliative care, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

William SilvesterRespecting Patient Choices, Austin Health, Heidelberg, Victoria, Australia.
Ruth A Parslow
Virginia J Lewis
Rachael S Fullam
Rebekah Sjanta
Lynne Jackson
Vanessa White
Rosalie Hudson
Austin Health · AULa Trobe University · AUUniversity of Melbourne · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo report on the quality of advance care planning (ACP) documents in use in residential aged care facilities (RACF) in areas of Victoria Australia prior to a systematic intervention; to report on the development and performance of an aged care specific Advance Care Plan template used during the intervention.

designAn audit of the quality of pre-existing documentation used to record resident treatment preferences and end-of-life wishes at participating RACFs; development and pilot of an aged care specific Advance Care Plan template; an audit of the completeness and quality of Advance Care Plans completed on the new template during a systematic ACP intervention. PARTICIPANTS AND

setting19 selected RACFs (managed by 12 aged care organisations) in metropolitan and regional areas of Victoria.

resultsDocumentation in use at facilities prior to the ACP intervention most commonly recorded preferences regarding hospital transfer, life prolonging treatment and personal/cultural/religious wishes. However, 7 of 12 document sets failed to adequately and clearly specify the resident's preferences as regards life prolonging medical treatment. The newly developed aged care specific Advance Care Plan template was met with approval by participating RACFs. Of 203 Advance Care Plans completed on the template throughout the project period, 49% included the appointment of a Medical Enduring Power of Attorney. Requests concerning medical treatment were specified in almost all completed documents (97%), with 73% nominating the option of refusal of life-prolonging treatment. Over 90% of plans included information concerning residents' values and beliefs, and future health situations that the resident would find to be unacceptable were specified in 78% of completed plans.

conclusionsStandardised procedures and documentation are needed to improve the quality of processes, documents and outcomes of ACP in the residential aged care sector.

Indexed as

Advance DirectivesAdvance Care PlanningAgedAged, 80 and overAttitude to DeathDocumentationHomes for the AgedHumansLife Support CareNursing HomesPatient Care PlanningPatient PreferenceQuality of Health CareTerminal CareVictoriaAdvance Care PlanningAdvance DirectivesAged CareEnd-of-lifeNursing HomesTerminal Care

Identifiers

PMID23626906
PMCPMC3632978
OpenAlexW2151308982

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.