Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23626623›Full record

ArticleJournal of research in medical sciences : the official journal of Isfahan University of Medical Sciences2012

A comparison of intraocular pressure and hemodynamic responses to insertion of laryngeal mask airway or endotracheal tube using anesthesia with propofol and remifentanil in cataract surgery.

Mohsen Ziyaeifard, Rasoul Azarfarin, Gholamreza Massoumi

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of research in medical sciences : the official journal of Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Comparison of endotracheal intubation, laryngeal mask airway, and I-gel in children undergoing strabismus surgery.Journal of research in medical sciences : the official journal of Isfahan University of Medical Sciences · 2021
    Article
  2. Introducing a new instrument "Downpipe endotracheal tube" for improving the safety of percutaneous dilatational tracheostomy.Journal of research in medical sciences : the official journal of Isfahan University of Medical Sciences · 2020
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Mohsen ZiyaeifardFellowship of Cardiac Anaesthesia, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Rasoul Azarfarin
Gholamreza Massoumi
Tehran University of Medical Sciences · IR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe aim of this study was to evaluate intraocular pressure (IOP) and hemodynamic responses following insertion of laryngeal mask airway (LMA) or endotracheal tube (ETT) after anesthesia induction with propofol and remifentanil in cataract surgery. MATERIALS AND

methodsIn a randomized controlled study, 50 adults scheduled for elective cataract extraction procedure under general anesthesia were allocated to LMA insertion (n = 25) or ETT (n = 25) groups. IOP, systolic blood pressure (SBP), diastolic blood pressure (DBP), and heart rate (HR) were measured after insertion of the airway device every minute up to 5 min.

resultsThere were no significant differences between LMA and ETT groups in SBP, DBP, HR, and IOP immediately after airway instrumentation up to 5 min, except in 4th min in DBP, 2nd min in HR, and 5th min in IOP (7.9 ± 2.3 mmHg in LMA and 9.4 ± 2.5 mmHg in ETT group; P = 0.030). There was good surgeon satisfaction for providing acceptable surgical field in both groups (88% in LMA and 80% in ETT group; P = 0.702).

conclusionPropofol combined with remifentanil provides good and excellent conditions for insertion of LMA or ETT with minimal hemodynamic disturbances in cataract surgery. Considering LMA insertion is less traumatic than ETT, using LMA may be better than ETT for airway securing in these patients.

Indexed as

Cataract surgeryhemodynamic responseslaryngeal mask airwaypropofolremifentanil

Identifiers

PMID23626623
PMCPMC3634284
OpenAlexW58854938

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.