Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23625996›Full record

ReviewBriefings in functional genomics2013

TET proteins: on the frenetic hunt for new cytosine modifications.

Benjamin Delatte, François Fuks

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Briefings in functional genomics, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
3.7field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 47 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. The epigenetics of aging and neurodegeneration.Progress in neurobiology · 2015
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. The potential role of O-GlcNAc modification in cancer epigenetics.Cellular & molecular biology letters · 2014
    Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Benjamin DelatteFNRS.
François Fuks

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Epigenetic genome marking and chromatin regulation are central to establishing tissue-specific gene expression programs, and hence to several biological processes. Until recently, the only known epigenetic mark on DNA in mammals was 5-methylcytosine, established and propagated by DNA methyltransferases and generally associated with gene repression. All of a sudden, a host of new actors-novel cytosine modifications and the ten eleven translocation (TET) enzymes-has appeared on the scene, sparking great interest. The challenge is now to uncover the roles they play and how they relate to DNA demethylation. Knowledge is accumulating at a frantic pace, linking these new players to essential biological processes (e.g. cell pluripotency and development) and also to cancerogenesis. Here, we review the recent progress in this exciting field, highlighting the TET enzymes as epigenetic DNA modifiers, their physiological roles, and their functions in health and disease. We also discuss the need to find relevant TET interactants and the newly discovered TET-O-linked N-acetylglucosamine transferase (OGT) pathway.

Indexed as

AnimalsCytosineDNA-Binding ProteinsDNA MethylationEpigenesis, GeneticHumansProto-Oncogene ProteinsCytosineDNA-Binding ProteinsProto-Oncogene ProteinsDNA methylationepigeneticshydroxymethylationOGTTET proteins

Identifiers

PMID23625996
PMCPMC3662890
OpenAlexW2129457750

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.