Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23625890›Full record

ArticleMolecular biology and evolution2013

Analysis of piRNA-mediated silencing of active TEs in Drosophila melanogaster suggests limits on the evolution of host genome defense.

Erin S Kelleher, Daniel A Barbash

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular biology and evolution, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 52 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
52citing papers in PubMed
7.9field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

52 citing papers in PubMed, 69 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Transposable element and host silencing activity in gigantic genomes.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2023
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Erin S KelleherDepartment of Molecular Biology and Genetics, Cornell University, NY, USA. esk72@cornell.edu
Daniel A Barbash
Cornell University · US

Funding

Molecular Genetics of Drosophila Hybrid LethalityR01GM074737 · NIGMS · CORNELL UNIVERSITY ITHACA · PI BARBASH, DANIEL A · 2005 to 2022
$4.7M
Evolution of piRNAs and germline transposon control in DrosophilaF32GM090567 · NIGMS · CORNELL UNIVERSITY · PI KELLEHER, ERIN S · 2010 to 2012
$146k
NIGMS NIH HHS 2R01GM074737NIGMS NIH HHS F32 GM090567NIGMS NIH HHS F32GM090567-02NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM074737
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Piwi-interacting RNA (piRNA) pathway defends animal genomes against the harmful consequences of transposable element (TE) infection by imposing small-RNA-mediated silencing. Because silencing is targeted by TE-derived piRNAs, piRNA production is posited to be central to the evolution of genome defense. We harnessed genomic data sets from Drosophila melanogaster, including genome-wide measures of piRNA, mRNA, and genomic abundance, along with estimates of age structure and risk of ectopic recombination, to address fundamental questions about the functional and evolutionary relationships between TE families and their regulatory piRNAs. We demonstrate that mRNA transcript abundance, robustness of "ping-pong" amplification, and representation in piRNA clusters together explain the majority of variation in piRNA abundance between TE families, providing the first robust statistical support for the prevailing model of piRNA biogenesis. Intriguingly, we also discover that the most transpositionally active TE families, with the greatest capacity to induce harmful mutations or disrupt gametogenesis, are not necessarily the most abundant among piRNAs. Rather, the level of piRNA targeting is largely independent of recent transposition rate for active TE families, but is rapidly lost for inactive TEs. These observations are consistent with population genetic theory that suggests a limited selective advantage for host repression of transposition. Additionally, we find no evidence that piRNA targeting responds to selection against a second major cost of TE infection: ectopic recombination between TE insertions. Our observations confirm the pivotal role of piRNA-mediated silencing in defending the genome against selfish transposition, yet also suggest limits to the optimization of host genome defense.

Indexed as

Evolution, MolecularGene SilencingGenome, InsectAnimalsDNA Transposable ElementsDrosophila melanogasterGene AmplificationGene DosageMultigene FamilyRecombination, GeneticRNA, Small InterferingSelection, GeneticTranscription, GeneticDNA Transposable ElementsRNA, Small Interferinggenome evolutionRNAitransposable elements

Identifiers

PMID23625890
PMCPMC3708497
OpenAlexW2130525868

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.