ReviewCurrent urology reports2013
Botulinum toxin-what urologic uses does the data support?
Review in Current urology reports, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- "What Medical Management Should Be First Line for Bladder Storage Symptoms in NLUTD"-Pro Botox.Neurourology and urodynamics · 2026Review
- First evidence of neosaxitoxin as a long-acting pain blocker in bladder pain syndrome.International urogynecology journal · 2015Article
- Brain-derived neurotrophic factor in urinary continence and incontinence.Nature reviews. Urology · 2014Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Botulinum toxin-A (BTX-A) is well established in the management of various aspects of lower urinary tract dysfunction (LUTD). One formulation, OnabotulinumtoxinA has recently been licensed in many parts of the world for use in neurogenic detrusor overactivity (NDO), and in the US for idiopathic overactive bladder (OAB), in patient's refractory to antimuscarinics. This review article looks at recent clinical publications that examine the use of BTX-A for the treatment of LUTD with a focus on OAB, detrusor overactivity (DO), benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) and Painful bladder syndrome / interstitial cystitis (PBS / IC). A literature review was conducted using the PubMed database and studies that were published within the time frame of January 2011 to present were included. Large randomised placebo controlled trials and a pooled analysis of patients with multiple sclerosis / spinal cord injury and NDO has suggested that BTX-A improved urinary incontinence (UI) episodes, urodynamic parameters and QoL in these patients. 200 U of OnabotulinumtoxinA appeared equivalent to 300 U. In patients with OAB, lower doses of 100 U OnabotulinumtoxinA, appear efficacious and with an acceptable adverse event profile. In one large phase III trial, de novo clean intermittent catheterisation rates were 6.1 %. Repeated injections in DO appear efficacious. Results from BPH studies are mixed, and the largest randomised study in this setting has shown significant improvements in a number of parameters for a variety of OnabotulinumtoxinA doses, but none of the doses were statistically better than placebo. Few studies have been conducted in PBS / IC and larger scale randomised placebo controlled trials are required to validate its use in this setting.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.