Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23625319›Full record

ArticleJournal of materials science. Materials in medicine2013

A novel porous scaffold fabrication technique for epithelial and endothelial tissue engineering.

Kevin J McHugh, Sarah L Tao, Magali Saint-Geniez

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of materials science. Materials in medicine, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Development of an electrospun biomimetic polyurea scaffold suitable for vascular grafting.Journal of biomedical materials research. Part B, Applied biomaterials · 2018
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Tubular organ epithelialisation.Journal of tissue engineering
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Kevin J McHughCharles Stark Draper Laboratory, Inc., 555 Technology Square, Cambridge, MA, 02136, USA.
Sarah L Tao
Magali Saint-Geniez
Draper Laboratory · USSmith-Kettlewell Eye Research Institute · US

Funding

Translational Research in BiomaterialsT32EB006359 · NIBIB · BOSTON UNIVERSITY (CHARLES RIVER CAMPUS) · PI MARK W. GRINSTAFF, Michelle H Teplensky · 2009 to 2026
$4.2M
Bioengineering of Bruch's Membrane for the treatment of Age-related Macular DegenDP2OD006649 · OD · SCHEPENS EYE RESEARCH INSTITUTE · PI SAINT-GENIEZ, MAGALI · 2009 to 2009
$2.9M
NIBIB NIH HHS T32 EB006359NIH HHS 1DP2OD006649NIH HHS DP2 OD006649
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Porous scaffolds have the ability to minimize transport barriers for both two- (2D) and three-dimensional tissue engineering. However, current porous scaffolds may be non-ideal for 2D tissues such as epithelium due to inherent fabrication-based characteristics. While 2D tissues require porosity to support molecular transport, pores must be small enough to prevent cell migration into the scaffold in order to avoid non-epithelial tissue architecture and compromised function. Though electrospun meshes are the most popular porous scaffolds used today, their heterogeneous pore size and intense topography may be poorly-suited for epithelium. Porous scaffolds produced using other methods have similar unavoidable limitations, frequently involving insufficient pore resolution and control, which make them incompatible with 2D tissues. In addition, many of these techniques require an entirely new round of process development in order to change material or pore size. Herein we describe "pore casting," a fabrication method that produces flat scaffolds with deterministic pore shape, size, and location that can be easily altered to accommodate new materials or pore dimensions. As proof-of-concept, pore-cast poly(ε-caprolactone) (PCL) scaffolds were fabricated and compared to electrospun PCL in vitro using canine kidney epithelium, human colon epithelium, and human umbilical vein endothelium. All cell types demonstrated improved morphology and function on pore-cast scaffolds, likely due to reduced topography and universally small pore size. These results suggest that pore casting is an attractive option for creating 2D tissue engineering scaffolds, especially when the application may benefit from well-controlled pore size or architecture.

Indexed as

AnimalsBiocompatible MaterialsCaco-2 CellsCells, CulturedDogsEndotheliumEpithelial CellsEpitheliumHumansHuman Umbilical Vein Endothelial CellsMaterials TestingMicrotechnologyPolyestersPorosityTissue EngineeringTissue ScaffoldsBiocompatible MaterialspolycaprolactonePolyesters

Identifiers

PMID23625319
PMCPMC4086292
OpenAlexW2046249168

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.