ReviewCurrent atherosclerosis reports2013
New stent retriever devices.
Review in Current atherosclerosis reports, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Mechanical Thrombectomy in Patients With Acute Ischemic Stroke: A Health Technology Assessment.Ontario health technology assessment series · 2016Pooled it
- Comparing a novel Catfish flow restoration device and the Solitaire stent retriever for thrombectomy revascularisation in emergent largevessel occlusion stroke: a prospective randomised controlled study.Stroke and vascular neurology · 2023Trial
- Evolution and advances in endovascular mechanical thrombectomy of cerebral venous sinus thrombosis.International journal of medical sciences · 2024Review
- Aspiration thrombectomy in clinical routine interventional stroke treatment : Is this the end of the stent retriever era?Clinical neuroradiology · 2018Article
- The Year Embolectomy Won: a Review of Five Trials Assessing the Efficacy of Mechanical Intervention in Acute Stroke.Current cardiology reports · 2015Review
- Mechanical thrombectomy in patients with acute vertebrobasilar occlusion using the Trevo device: a single-centre experience.Neuroradiology · 2014Article
- Endovascular treatment for acute ischemic stroke patients: implications and interpretation of IMS III, MR RESCUE, and SYNTHESIS EXPANSION trials: A report from the Working Group of International Congress of Interventional Neurology.Journal of vascular and interventional neurology · 2014Article
- Ischemic posterior circulation stroke: a review of anatomy, clinical presentations, diagnosis, and current management.Frontiers in neurology · 2014Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Acute ischemic stroke (AIS) is among the leading causes of adult death and number one cause of severe disability in the United States. In 1995 physicians had their first available Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved treatment for AIS in the form of intravenous tissue plasminogen activator (IV-tPA). Since then, there has been an explosion of interest into endovascular mechanical thrombectomy as a potential treatment of stroke. Beginning in 2004 with the Merci Retriever, there have been multiple devices tested for this purpose. In 2012, the FDA approved two new devices-the Trevo Pro and Solitaire stent retrievers-after they were shown to have superior rates of recanalization when compared to the Merci device. In this article we will highlight the similarities and differences in the devices themselves, and the trials that brought them into use. Lastly, we will briefly touch on the future of mechanical embolectomy and considerations for future trial designs and patient selection.
Indexed as
Identifiers
23625187What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.