Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23625140›Full record

Trial reportCommunity mental health journal2014

An implementation evaluation of the community engagement and planning intervention in the CPIC Depression Care Improvement Trial.

Dmitry Khodyakov, Mienah Zulfacar Sharif, Elizabeth L Dixon, Peter Mendel, Bowen Chung, Barbara Linkski, Janis Bush Jones

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Community mental health journal, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Community-partnered research conference model: the experience of Community Partners in Care study.Progress in community health partnerships : research, education, and action · 2014
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Dmitry KhodyakovThe RAND Corporation, 1776 Main Street, PO Box 2138, Santa Monica, CA, 90407-2138, USA, Dmitry_Khodyakov@rand.org.
Mienah Zulfacar Sharif
Elizabeth L Dixon
Peter Mendel
Bowen Chung
Barbara Linkski
Janis Bush Jones

Funding

UCLA Clinical and Translational Science InstituteUL1TR000124 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI DUBINETT, STEVEN M. · 2012 to 2015
$57.0M
The Role of Social Networks in Treatment Engagement for MinoritiesP30MH082760 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI WELLS, KENNETH B. · 2008 to 2012
$8.6M
COMMUNITY PARTNERS IN CARER01MH078853 · NIMH · RAND CORPORATION · PI WELLS, KENNETH B. · 2007 to 2011
$6.0M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR000124NIMH NIH HHS 5R01MH078853NIMH NIH HHS P30 MH082760-01NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH078853
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The goal of this paper is to document and evaluate the process of implementing an evidence-based depression intervention in community settings through the use of community-academic partnered approaches. We discuss how and to what extent the goals of community engagement and collaborative planning were achieved in the intervention arm of the Community Partners in Care study that aimed to adapt evidence-based depression care toolkits for diverse agencies in Hollywood and South Los Angeles. We find that partnered research strategies have a potential to effectively engage community members around depression and involve them in intervention planning activities. Our results suggest that successful collaboration among diverse agencies requires that they understand what is expected of them, are comfortable with the role they choose to perform, and have organizational support to contribute to the project. To facilitate the development of collaborative relationships, time and effort should be devoted to explaining how collaboration among diverse agencies may take place.

Indexed as

Community-Based Participatory ResearchCommunity-Institutional RelationsCommunity Mental Health ServicesCooperative BehaviorDepressionHumansLeadershipProgram DevelopmentProgram EvaluationQuality ImprovementUnited States

Identifiers

PMID23625140
PMCPMC3758395

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.