Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23624989›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2013

Medicines information needs during pregnancy: a multinational comparison.

Katri Hämeen-Anttila, Johanna Jyrkkä, Hannes Enlund, Hedvig Nordeng, Angela Lupattelli, Esa Kokki

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Katri Hämeen-AnttilaFinnish Medicines Agency, Kuopio, Finland.
Johanna Jyrkkä
Hannes Enlund
Hedvig Nordeng
Angela Lupattelli
Esa Kokki

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThe aim was to assess the perceived needs of medicines information and information sources for pregnant women in various countries.

designCross-sectional internet-based study.

settingMultinational.

participantsPregnant women and women with children less than 25 weeks. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: The need for information about medicines was assessed by a question: 'Did you need information about medicines during the course of your pregnancy?' A list of commonly used sources of information was given to explore those that are used.

resultsAltogether, 7092 eligible women responded to the survey (5090 pregnant women and 2002 women with a child less than 25 weeks). Of the respondents, 57% (n=4054, range between different countries 46-77%) indicated a need for information about medicines during their pregnancy. On average, respondents used three different information sources. The most commonly used information sources were healthcare professionals-physicians (73%), pharmacy personnel (46%) and midwifes or nurses (33%)-and the internet (60%). There were distinct differences in the information needs and information sources used in different countries.

conclusionsA large proportion of pregnant women have perceived information needs about medicines during pregnancy, and they rely on healthcare professionals. The internet is also a widely used information source. Further studies are needed to evaluate the use of the internet as a medicines information source by pregnant women.

Identifiers

PMID23624989
PMCPMC3641472

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.