ArticleNeurochemical research2013
Differential expression of micro-heterogeneous LewisX-type glycans in the stem cell compartment of the developing mouse spinal cord.
Article in Neurochemical research, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
- Neural glycomics: the sweet side of nervous system functions.Cellular and molecular life sciences : CMLS · 2021Review
- The distribution of the proteoglycan FORSE-1 in the developing mouse central nervous system.Journal of anatomy · 2019Article
- Enhanced Neuronal Survival and Neurite Outgrowth Triggered by Novel Small Organic Compounds Mimicking the LewisX Glycan.Molecular neurobiology · 2018Article
- Article
- Factors influencing the spinal motoneurons in development.Neural regeneration research · 2015Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Complex glycan structures and their respective carrier molecules are often expressed in a cell type specific manner. Thus, glycans can be used for the enrichment of specific cell types such as neural precursor cells (NPCs). We have recently shown that the monoclonal antibodies 487(LeX) and 5750(LeX) differentially detect the LewisX (LeX) glycan on NPCs in the developing mouse forebrain. Here, we analysed the staining pattern of both antibodies during late embryonic mouse spinal cord development. At E13.5 both antibodies strongly label the central canal region. Along these lines they detect the LeX glycan primarily on Nestin-positive NPCs at that age. Moreover, we show that spinal cord NPCs cultured as free floating neurospheres display a high immunoreactivity to both antibodies. In that context, we also demonstrate that the 487(LeX) antibody can be used to deplete a subpopulation of neurosphere forming NPCs from a mixed E13.5 spinal cord cell suspension. Towards the end of embryogenesis the overall immunoreactivity to both antibodies increases and the staining appears very diffuse. However, the 5750(LeX) antibody still labels the central canal region. The increase in immunoreactivity correlates with an expression increase of the extracellular matrix molecules Tenascin C and Receptor Protein Tyrosine Phosphatase β/ζ, two potential LeX carrier proteins. In line with this, immunoprecipitation analyses confirmed Tenascin C as a LeX carrier protein in the embryonic mouse spinal cord. However, the immunoreactivity to both antibodies appears only to be marginally affected in the absence of Tenascin C, arguing against Tenascin C being the major LeX carrier. In conclusion our study gives some novel insights into the complex expression of LeX glycans and potential carrier proteins during the development of the mouse spinal cord.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.