Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23624919›Full record

ArticleOncogene2014

MEK inhibition affects STAT3 signaling and invasion in human melanoma cell lines.

A Vultur, J Villanueva, C Krepler, G Rajan, Q Chen, M Xiao, L Li, P A Gimotty, M Wilson, J Hayden and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Oncogene, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 61 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
61citing papers in PubMed
5.2field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

61 citing papers in PubMed, 100 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Yap1 Mediates Trametinib Resistance in Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinomas.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2021
    Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Integrated approaches to sensitizing melanoma to radiotherapy.Strahlentherapie und Onkologie : Organ der Deutschen Rontgengesellschaft ... [et al] · 2026
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Salviolone fromInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Article

1 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

A VulturMolecular and Cellular Oncogenesis Program, Melanoma Research Center, The Wistar Institute, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
J VillanuevaMolecular and Cellular Oncogenesis Program, Melanoma Research Center, The Wistar Institute, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
C KreplerMolecular and Cellular Oncogenesis Program, Melanoma Research Center, The Wistar Institute, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
G RajanMolecular and Cellular Oncogenesis Program, Melanoma Research Center, The Wistar Institute, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Q ChenMolecular and Cellular Oncogenesis Program, Melanoma Research Center, The Wistar Institute, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
M XiaoMolecular and Cellular Oncogenesis Program, Melanoma Research Center, The Wistar Institute, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
L LiMolecular and Cellular Oncogenesis Program, Melanoma Research Center, The Wistar Institute, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
P A GimottyDepartment of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
M WilsonAbramson Cancer Center, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
J HaydenImaging Facility, Division of Molecular and Cellular Biology, The Wistar Institute, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
F KeeneyImaging Facility, Division of Molecular and Cellular Biology, The Wistar Institute, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
K L NathansonAbramson Cancer Center, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
M Herlyn1] Molecular and Cellular Oncogenesis Program, Melanoma Research Center, The Wistar Institute, Philadelphia, PA, USA [2] Imaging Facility, Division of Molecular and Cellular Biology, The Wistar Institute, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
The Wistar Institute · USUniversity of Pennsylvania · US

Funding

UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA CAN CTR SUPPORT GRANTP30CA016520 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI SHELLEY L BERGER · 1985 to 2026
$222.3M
Tumor Microenvironment and MetastasisP30CA010815 · NCI · WISTAR INSTITUTE · PI Luis J Montaner · 1985 to 2026
$75.9M
Targeting the MAP and PI3 Kinase Pathways in MelanomaP01CA114046 · NCI · WISTAR INSTITUTE · PI MURPHY, MAUREEN E. · 2008 to 2023
$37.1M
TUMOR DEVELOPMENT AND PROGRESSION IN HUMAN MELANOCYTESP01CA025874 · NCI · WISTAR INSTITUTE · PI BASTIAN, BORIS C. · 1985 to 2015
$19.0M
CANCER RESEARCH TRAINING PROGRAMT32CA009615 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI Gregory L Beatty, MICHAEL D HOGARTY · 1988 to 2026
$10.4M
METASTATIS: BIOLOGICAL PHENOTYPE AND MODELS FOR THERAPYR01CA047159 · NCI · WISTAR INSTITUTE · PI HERLYN, MEENHARD F · 1989 to 2015
$3.9M
Molecular approaches to overcome intrinsic drug resistance in BRAF and NRAS-mutanK01CA175269 · NCI · WISTAR INSTITUTE · PI VILLANUEVA, JESSIE · 2013 to 2017
$754k
NCI NIH HHS K01 CA175269NCI NIH HHS P01 CA025874NCI NIH HHS P01 CA114046NCI NIH HHS P30 CA010815NCI NIH HHS P30 CA016520NCI NIH HHS R01 CA047159NCI NIH HHS T32 CA009615
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Elevated activity of the mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) signaling cascade is found in the majority of human melanomas and is known to regulate proliferation, survival and invasion. Current targeted therapies focus on decreasing the activity of this pathway; however, we do not fully understand how these therapies impact tumor biology, especially given that melanoma is a heterogeneous disease. Using a three-dimensional (3D), collagen-embedded spheroid melanoma model, we observed that MEK and BRAF inhibitors can increase the invasive potential of ∼20% of human melanoma cell lines. The invasive cell lines displayed increased receptor tyrosine kinase (RTK) activity and activation of the Src/FAK/signal transducers and activators of transcription-3 (STAT3) signaling axis, also associated with increased cell-to-cell adhesion and cadherin engagement following MEK inhibition. Targeting various RTKs, Src, FAK and STAT3 with small molecule inhibitors in combination with a MEK inhibitor prevented the invasive phenotype, but only STAT3 inhibition caused cell death in the 3D context. We further show that STAT3 signaling is induced in BRAF-inhibitor-resistant cells. Our findings suggest that MEK and BRAF inhibitors can induce STAT3 signaling, causing potential adverse effects such as increased invasion. We also provide the rationale for the combined targeting of the MAPK pathway along with inhibitors of RTKs, SRC or STAT3 to counteract STAT3-mediated resistance phenotypes.

Indexed as

Gene Expression Regulation, NeoplasticCadherinsCell AdhesionCell Line, TumorCell SurvivalDNA Mutational AnalysisDrug Resistance, NeoplasmHumansMelanomaMitogen-Activated Protein KinasesNeoplasm InvasivenessProto-Oncogene Proteins B-rafSignal TransductionSkinSkin NeoplasmsSTAT3 Transcription FactorBRAF protein, humanCadherinsMitogen-Activated Protein KinasesProto-Oncogene Proteins B-rafSTAT3 protein, humanSTAT3 Transcription Factor

Identifiers

PMID23624919
PMCPMC3769503
OpenAlexW1970323663

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.