Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23623548›Full record

ArticleCurrent biology : CB2013

The demographic transition influences variance in fitness and selection on height and BMI in rural Gambia.

Alexandre Courtiol, Ian J Rickard, Virpi Lummaa, Andrew M Prentice, Anthony J C Fulford, Stephen C Stearns

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Current biology : CB, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. The evolutionary puzzle of cognition: challenges and insights from individual-based studies.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2025
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. When genes and environment disagree: Making sense of trends in recent human evolution.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2016
    Article
  8. Genetic evidence for natural selection in humans in the contemporary United States.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2016
    Article
  9. Understanding variation in human fertility: what can we learn from evolutionary demography?Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2016
    Review
  10. How does variance in fertility change over the demographic transition?Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2016
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Do the Low WHRs and BMIs Judged Most Attractive Indicate Higher Fertility?Evolutionary psychology : an international journal of evolutionary approaches to psychology and behavior
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Alexandre CourtiolDepartment of Evolutionary Genetics, Leibniz Institute for Zoo and Wildlife Research, 10315 Berlin, Germany.
Ian J Rickard
Virpi Lummaa
Andrew M Prentice
Anthony J C Fulford
Stephen C Stearns

Funding

Medical Research Council MC-A760-5QX00Medical Research Council MC_U123292701Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recent human history is marked by demographic transitions characterized by declines in mortality and fertility. By influencing the variance in those fitness components, demographic transitions can affect selection on other traits. Parallel to changes in selection triggered by demography per se, relationships between fitness and anthropometric traits are also expected to change due to modification of the environment. Here we explore for the first time these two main evolutionary consequences of demographic transitions using a unique data set containing survival, fertility, and anthropometric data for thousands of women in rural Gambia from 1956-2010. We show how the demographic transition influenced directional selection on height and body mass index (BMI). We observed a change in selection for both traits mediated by variation in fertility: selection initially favored short females with high BMI values but shifted across the demographic transition to favor tall females with low BMI values. We demonstrate that these differences resulted both from changes in fitness variance that shape the strength of selection and from shifts in selective pressures triggered by environmental changes. These results suggest that demographic and environmental trends encountered by current human populations worldwide are likely to modify, but not stop, natural selection in humans.

Indexed as

Body HeightBody Mass IndexDemographyPhysical FitnessSelection, GeneticFemaleGambiaHumansMale

Identifiers

PMID23623548
PMCPMC3668323

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.