Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23622110›Full record

ArticleBMC medicine2013

Targeted rotavirus vaccination of high-risk infants; a low cost and highly cost-effective alternative to universal vaccination.

Patricia Bruijning-Verhagen, Marie-Josée J Mangen, Mariet Felderhof, Nico G Hartwig, Marlies van Houten, Léon Winkel, Wouter J de Waal, Marc J M Bonten

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medicine, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 42 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Systematic review of the economic value of diarrheal vaccines.Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics · 2014
    Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Potential safety issues and other factors that may affect the introduction and uptake of rotavirus vaccines.Clinical microbiology and infection : the official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases · 2016
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Economics and financing of vaccines for diarrheal diseases.Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics · 2014
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Patricia Bruijning-VerhagenJulius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Huispostnummer STR,6,131, Postbus 85500, Utrecht 3508 GA, The Netherlands. P.Bruijning@umcutrecht.nl
Marie-Josée J Mangen
Mariet Felderhof
Nico G Hartwig
Marlies van Houten
Léon Winkel
Wouter J de Waal
Marc J M Bonten
University Medical Center Utrecht · NLSint Franciscus Gasthuis · NLSpaarne Gasthuis · NLSpaarne Ziekenhuis · NLUtrecht University · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe cost-effectiveness of universal rotavirus (RV) vaccination is controversial in developed countries. As a result, RV vaccination programs do not currently exist in most European countries. Hospitalization is the main driver of RV disease costs, and prematurity, low birth weight (LBW) and underlying medical conditions have been associated with RV hospitalization and complications. We investigated the cost-effectiveness of targeted RV vaccination of high-risk infants and universal RV vaccination versus no vaccination.

methodsDisease burden, mortality and healthcare costs of RV hospitalization for children with and without prematurity, LBW and congenital pathology were quantified in two hospital-based observational studies in the Netherlands. Cost-effectiveness analysis was based on an age-structured stochastic multi-cohort model of the Dutch population comparing universal RV vaccination and targeted vaccination of high-risk infants to no vaccination. The primary endpoint was the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER), with a threshold of €35,000/quality-adjusted life year (QALY) from the healthcare provider perspective. Sensitivity analyses included vaccine price and coverage, herd-immunity and QALY losses.

resultsA total of 936 children with RV infection were included. Prematurity, LBW and congenital pathology were associated with increased risks of RV hospitalization (relative risks (RR) ranging from 1.6 to 4.4), ICU admission (RR ranging from 4.2 to 7.9), prolonged hospital stay (1.5 to 3.0 excess days) and higher healthcare costs (€648 to €1,533 excess costs). Seven children succumbed due to RV complications, all belonging to the high-risk population. Targeted RV vaccination was highly cost-effective and potentially cost-saving from the healthcare provider perspective with ICERs below €20,000/QALY in all scenarios with total (undiscounted) annual healthcare costs between -€0.1 and €0.5 million/year. Results were most sensitive to mortality rates, but targeted vaccination remained highly cost-effective up to reductions of 90% compared to observed mortality. Universal RV vaccination was not considered cost-effective (mean ICER: €60,200/QALY) unless herd-immunity and caretaker QALY losses were included and vaccine prices were €60 at most (mean ICER: €21,309/QALY).

conclusionWe recommend targeted RV vaccination for high-risk infants in developed countries.

Indexed as

AdolescentCase-Control StudiesChildChild, PreschoolCost-Benefit AnalysisCost of IllnessFemaleHealth Care CostsHumansInfantInfant, NewbornMaleModels, StatisticalNetherlandsRetrospective StudiesRotavirus InfectionsRotavirus Vaccines

Identifiers

PMID23622110
PMCPMC3665442
OpenAlexW2045020624

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.