ReviewClinical journal of the American Society of Nephrology : CJASN2013
Type 2 translational research for CKD.
Review in Clinical journal of the American Society of Nephrology : CJASN, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- The Challenges and Opportunities of Translational Pathology.Journal of clinical and translational pathology · 2022Article
- Patient Navigation: Addressing Social Challenges in Dialysis Patients.American journal of kidney diseases : the official journal of the National Kidney Foundation · 2020Review
- Population Health for CKD and Diabetes: Lessons From the Indian Health Service.American journal of kidney diseases : the official journal of the National Kidney Foundation · 2018Review
- Mapping the evolving definitions of translational research.Journal of clinical and translational science · 2017Review
- Educating Patients about CKD: The Path to Self-Management and Patient-Centered Care.Clinical journal of the American Society of Nephrology : CJASN · 2016Article
- Development of a chronic kidney disease patient navigator program.BMC nephrology · 2015Article
- Translational nephrology: what translational research is and a bird's-eye view on translational research in nephrology.Clinical kidney journal · 2015Article
- Chronic kidney disease care in the US safety net.Advances in chronic kidney disease · 2015Review
- The last mile: translational research to improve CKD outcomes.Clinical journal of the American Society of Nephrology : CJASN · 2014Article
- New models of chronic kidney disease care including pharmacists: improving medication reconciliation and medication management.Current opinion in nephrology and hypertension · 2013Review
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Strategies to effectively treat people with CKD have been identified by conventional clinical research. Despite this evidence, awareness, screening, detection, diagnosis, risk factor control, treatment, and outcomes remain substandard. Translating clinical evidence into actionable measures that reduce the burden of CKD is a pressing need. Expansion from a "bench-to-bedside" paradigm (conventional type 1 translation) to research that encompasses "clinic and community" is the core concept of type 2 translation. Specifically, this is the discipline of identifying factors and using strategies that lead to adoption, maintenance, and sustainability of science-based interventions in practice. This review identifies key elements of type 2 translational research and highlights the current scope of this type of research for CKD. For type 2 translation to achieve the goals of providing high-quality care and better health outcomes, key facilitators (e.g., theory-based frameworks, adaptable interventions, and inclusion of sustainability and evaluation metrics) and essential elements (e.g., multidisciplinary team care, health information technology, and stakeholder engagement) must be integrated. The National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases recently funded five proposals that aim to improve outcomes for people with CKD, focusing on diverse components of the healthcare continuum: patient safety and transitions; delivery of high-quality, evidence-based CKD care; and elimination of disparities. The need for type 2 translational research in CKD is urgent because of preventable human suffering and unsustainable costs of providing care. Focus on the theory, framework, and approaches we have suggested may help us meet that challenge.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.