ReviewDrug safety2013
Cardiovascular safety of tyrosine kinase inhibitors: with a special focus on cardiac repolarisation (QT interval).
Review in Drug safety, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 68 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
68 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- QTc interval prolongation with vascular endothelial growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors.British journal of cancer · 2015Pooled it
- Phase II trial of multi-kinase inhibitor ESK981 in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer.Investigational new drugs · 2024Trial
- Parent and Metabolite Concentration-QT Modeling to Evaluate QT-Interval Prolongation at Savolitinib Therapeutic Doses.The AAPS journal · 2021Trial
- Palbociclib has no clinically relevant effect on the QTc interval in patients with advanced breast cancer.Anti-cancer drugs · 2018Trial
- AKT (Ser473) suppression mediates ceritinib cardiotoxicity through autophagic flux impairment and mitochondrial injury.Acta pharmacologica Sinica · 2026Article
- QT Prolongation and Arrhythmias in Cancer Therapy: A Narrative Review of Mechanistic and Clinical Studies.Cardiovascular toxicology · 2026Review
- From data to decision: a clinical pipeline for wearable AI in early cardiotoxicity detection.Cardio-oncology (London, England) · 2026Review
- RET Signaling Pathway in Human Cancer: Oncogenic Mechanisms, Selective Inhibitors, and Emerging Resistance Strategies.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Medical Management of Well-Differentiated Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors: From Conventional Therapies to Emerging Strategies.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- An Integrated Nonclinical and Clinical Risk Assessment of the Effects of Investigational ATRi Tuvusertib on QTc Interval in Patients With Solid Tumors.Clinical and translational science · 2026Article
- Using a Novel Consensus-Based Chemoinformatics Approach to Predict ADMET Properties and Druglikeness of Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
- Cardiovascular toxicity of anaplastic lymphoma kinase inhibitors for patients with non-small cell lung cancer: a network meta-analysis.Future oncology (London, England) · 2025Article
- Article
- The Complex Connection Between Myocardial Dysfunction and Cancer Beyond Cardiotoxicity: Shared Risk Factors and Common Molecular Pathways.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Review
- Exploration of protein and genetic targets causing atrioventricular block: mendelian-randomization analyses based on eQTL data and pQTL data.BMC cardiovascular disorders · 2024Article
- EGFR-TKIs - induced cardiotoxicity in NSCLC: incidence, evaluation, and monitoring.Frontiers in oncology · 2024Review
- The association of QTc prolongation with cardiovascular events in cancer patients taking tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs).Cardio-oncology (London, England) · 2023Article
- Cardiovascular Toxicities Associated with Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors.Current cardiology reports · 2023Review
- CDK4/6 inhibitors: basics, pros, and major cons in breast cancer treatment with specific regard to cardiotoxicity - a narrative review.Therapeutic advances in medical oncology · 2023Review
- Ventricular Arrhythmia in Cancer Patients: Mechanisms, Treatment Strategies and Future Avenues.Arrhythmia & electrophysiology review · 2023Review
8 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The development of tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI) represents a major milestone in oncology. However, their use has been found to be associated with serious toxicities that impinge on various vital organs including the heart. Sixteen TKIs have been approved for use in oncology as of 30 September 2012, and a large number of others are in development or under regulatory review. Cardiovascular safety of medicinal products is a major public health issue that has concerned all the stakeholders. This review focuses on three specific cardiovascular safety aspects of TKIs, namely their propensity to induce QT interval prolongation, left ventricular (LV) dysfunction and hypertension (both systemic and pulmonary). Analyses of information in drug labels, the data submitted to the regulatory authorities and the published literature show that a number of TKIs are associated with these undesirable effects. Whereas LV dysfunction and systemic hypertension are on-target effects related to the inhibition of ligand-related signalling pathways, QT interval prolongation appears to be an off-target class III electrophysiologic effect, possibly related to the presence of a fluorine-based pharmacophore. If not adequately managed, these cardiovascular effects significantly increase the morbidity and mortality in a population already at high risk. Hitherto, the QT effect of most QT-prolonging TKIs (except lapatinib, nilotinib, sunitinib and vandetanib) is relatively mild at clinical doses and has not led to appreciable morbidity clinically. In contrast, LV dysfunction and untreated hypertension have resulted in significant morbidity. Inevitably, dilemmas arise in determining the risk/benefit of a TKI therapy in an individual patient who develops any of these effects following the treatment of the TKI-sensitive cancer. QT interval prolongation, hypertension and LV dysfunction can be managed effectively by using reliable methods of measurement and careful monitoring of patients whose clinical management requires optimisation by a close collaboration between an oncologist and a cardiologist, an evolving subspecialty referred to as cardio-oncology. Despite their potential adverse clinical impact, the effects of TKIs on hypertension and LV function are generally inadequately characterised during their development. As has been the case with QT liability of drugs, there is now a persuasive case for a regulatory requirement to study TKIs systematically for these effects. Furthermore, since most of these novel drugs are studied in trials with relatively small sample sizes and approved on an expedited basis, there is also a compelling case for their effective pharmacovigilance and on-going reassessment of their risk/benefit after approval.
Indexed as
Identifiers
23620167What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.