Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23620117›Full record

ReviewPathogens and disease2013

Microbial biofilms and gastrointestinal diseases.

Erik C von Rosenvinge, Graeme A O'May, Sandra Macfarlane, George T Macfarlane, Mark E Shirtliff

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Pathogens and disease, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 44 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
44citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

44 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Biofilms and Benign Colonic Diseases.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Wolf in Sheep's Clothing:Microorganisms · 2021
    Review
  19. Review
  20. Gastrointestinal biofilms in health and disease.Nature reviews. Gastroenterology & hepatology · 2021
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Erik C von RosenvingeDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21201, USA.
Graeme A O'May
Sandra Macfarlane
George T Macfarlane
Mark E Shirtliff

Funding

Staphylococcus aureus biofilms: in vitro and in vivo studiesR01AI069568 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND BALTIMORE · PI SHIRTLIFF, MARK E · 2007 to 2011
$2.1M
NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI069568
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The majority of bacteria live not planktonically, but as residents of sessile biofilm communities. Such populations have been defined as 'matrix-enclosed microbial accretions, which adhere to both biological and nonbiological surfaces'. Bacterial formation of biofilm is implicated in many chronic disease states. Growth in this mode promotes survival by increasing community recalcitrance to clearance by host immune effectors and therapeutic antimicrobials. The human gastrointestinal (GI) tract encompasses a plethora of nutritional and physicochemical environments, many of which are ideal for biofilm formation and survival. However, little is known of the nature, function, and clinical relevance of these communities. This review summarizes current knowledge of the composition and association with health and disease of biofilm communities in the GI tract.

Indexed as

Bacterial Physiological PhenomenaAnimalsBacteriaBiofilmsBiotaGastrointestinal DiseasesHumans

Identifiers

PMID23620117
PMCPMC4395855

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.