Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23619944›Full record

ArticleCellular oncology (Dordrecht, Netherlands)2013

Insulin-like growth factor-1 receptor (IGF-1R) as a biomarker for resistance to the tyrosine kinase inhibitor gefitinib in non-small cell lung cancer.

Nir Peled, Murry W Wynes, Norihiko Ikeda, Tatsuo Ohira, Koichi Yoshida, Jin Qian, Maya Ilouze, Ronen Brenner, Yasufumi Kato, Celine Mascaux and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cellular oncology (Dordrecht, Netherlands), 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 52 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
52citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
10.7field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

52 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 89 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Nir PeledDepartment of Medicine/Medical Oncology, University of Colorado Cancer Center, UC Denver, 12801 E 17th Ave, Mail Stop 8177, Aurora, CO 80045, USA. nirp@post.tau.ac.il
Murry W Wynes
Norihiko Ikeda
Tatsuo Ohira
Koichi Yoshida
Jin Qian
Maya Ilouze
Ronen Brenner
Yasufumi Kato
Celine Mascaux
Fred R Hirsch
University of Colorado Denver · USTokyo Medical University · JPSheba Medical Center · ILUniversity of Colorado Cancer Center · US

Funding

University of Colorado Cancer Center Support Grant - Lung Cancer Patient-Derived Xenografts with Autologous Human Immune SystemsP30CA046934 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO DENVER · PI James V Degregori · 1988 to 2026
$117.0M
Tissue Bank and Biomarkers CoreP50CA058187 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO DENVER · PI MILLER, YORK E · 1992 to 2018
$43.8M
NCI NIH HHS CA580187NCI NIH HHS P30 CA046934NCI NIH HHS P50 CA058187
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe insulin-like growth factor-1 receptor (IGF-1R) pathway is known to play a role in the acquisition of resistance to epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-specific tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, its exact role in TKI resistance has so far remained unclear. Here, we interrogated the hypothesis that the IGF-1R may serve as a biomarker for, and may play a role in, intrinsic resistance to the EGFR-specific TKI gefitinib in NSCLC.

methodsTotal-IGF-1R and phosphorylated (p)-IGF-1R expression levels were related to gefitinib sensitivity in 23 NSCLC cell lines. This sensitivity was re-evaluated after knocking down IGF-1R expression and after IGF-1R up-regulation through exogenous IGF-1 expression. The utility of IGF-1R expression as a predictive biomarker was also evaluated by immunohistochemistry (IHC) in 98 primary NSCLC samples from patients treated with gefitinib.

resultsSeventeen of the cell lines tested were resistant to gefitinib, whereas 3 cell lines were sensitive. The three remaining cell lines showed intermediate values. Thirteen resistant cell lines were found to be positive for total-IGF-1R expression, while all the sensitive cell lines were negative, resulting in a positive predictive value (PPV) of 81% for total-IGF-1R to predict resistance. Seven resistant cell lines exhibited high p-IGF-1R levels, whereas all 3 sensitive cell lines were negative for p-IGF-1R, resulting in a PPV of 100% for p-IGF-1R to predict resistance. Neither a knock-down of IGF-1R expression nor an activation of the IGF1-R pathway through exogenous IGF-1 expression affected gefitinib sensitivity. In primary NSCLC tissues, IGF-1R expression was found to be significantly higher in patients with progressive disease, i.e., showing gefitinib resistance, as compared to those with a complete or partial response.

conclusionsIGF-1R acts as a predictor for resistance to gefitinib in NSCLC cell lines and NSCLC patients, but does not seem to play a role in the intrinsic resistance to this drug. High total-IGF-1R and p-IGR-1R levels may predict such a resistance. Since the underlying mechanism does not appear to be related to proliferation induction, alternative pathways should be explored.

Indexed as

Biomarkers, TumorCarcinoma, Non-Small-Cell LungCell Line, TumorCell ProliferationCell SurvivalDrug Resistance, NeoplasmErbB ReceptorsFemaleGefitinibHEK293 CellsHumansImmunoblottingImmunohistochemistryInhibitory Concentration 50Kaplan-Meier EstimateLung NeoplasmsBiomarkers, TumorErbB ReceptorsGefitinibProtein Kinase InhibitorsQuinazolinesReceptor, IGF Type 1

Identifiers

PMID23619944
PMCPMC4186686
OpenAlexW2017288701

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.