Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23619576›Full record

ArticleRNA biology2013

Two CRISPR-Cas systems in Methanosarcina mazei strain Gö1 display common processing features despite belonging to different types I and III.

Lisa Nickel, Katrin Weidenbach, Dominik Jäger, Rolf Backofen, Sita J Lange, Nadja Heidrich, Ruth A Schmitz

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in RNA biology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed
3.4field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed, 61 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Evolutionary trends inmSystems · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Teaching old dogs new tricks: genetic engineering methanogens.Applied and environmental microbiology · 2024
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Molecular mechanisms of CRISPR-Cas spacer acquisition.Nature reviews. Microbiology · 2019
    Review
  19. Article
  20. sRNARNA biology · 2017
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 6 institutions in 2 countries.

Lisa NickelInstitut für Allgemeine Mikrobiologie, Christian-Albrechts-Universität zu Kiel, Am Botanischen Garten 1-9, Kiel, Germany.
Katrin Weidenbach
Dominik Jäger
Rolf Backofen
Sita J Lange
Nadja Heidrich
Ruth A Schmitz
Institut für Medizinische Informatik, Biometrie und Epidemiologie · DEBotanic Garden and Botanical Museum Berlin · DEInstitute of Bioinformatics · INKiel University · DEUniversity of Freiburg · DEUniversity of Würzburg · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats (CRISPR) system represents a highly adaptive and heritable defense system against foreign nucleic acids in bacteria and archaea. We analyzed the two CRISPR-Cas systems in Methanosarcina mazei strain Gö1. Although belonging to different subtypes (I-B and III-B), the leaders and repeats of both loci are nearly identical. Also, despite many point mutations in each array, a common hairpin motif was identified in the repeats by a bioinformatics analysis and in vitro structural probing. The expression and maturation of CRISPR-derived RNAs (crRNAs) were studied in vitro and in vivo. Both respective potential Cas6b-type endonucleases were purified and their activity tested in vitro. Each protein showed significant activity and could cleave both repeats at the same processing site. Cas6b of subtype III-B, however, was significantly more efficient in its cleavage activity compared with Cas6b of subtype I-B. Northern blot and differential RNAseq analyses were performed to investigate in vivo transcription and maturation of crRNAs, revealing generally very low expression of both systems, whereas significant induction at high NaCl concentrations was observed. crRNAs derived proximal to the leader were generally more abundant than distal ones and in vivo processing sites were clarified for both loci, confirming the previously well-established 8 nt 5' repeat tags. The 3'-ends were more diverse, but generally ended in a prefix of the following repeat sequence (3'-tag). The analysis further revealed a 5'-hydroxy and 3'-phosphate termini architecture of small crRNAs specific for cleavage products of Cas6 endonucleases from type I-E and I-F and type III-B.

Indexed as

CRISPR-Cas SystemsBase SequenceComputational BiologyCRISPR-Associated ProteinsMethanosarcinaMolecular Sequence DataRNA, ArchaealRNA Processing, Post-TranscriptionalSequence AlignmentSequence Analysis, RNASodium ChlorideCRISPR-Associated ProteinsRNA, ArchaealSodium ChlorideCRISPR-Cas systemimmunity of prokaryotesmethanoarchaeaMethanosarcina mazeiphagesregulatory RNA

Identifiers

PMID23619576
PMCPMC3737336
OpenAlexW2071195434

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.