Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23619467›Full record

ReviewJournal of breath research2013

ABA-Cloud: support for collaborative breath research.

Ibrahim Elsayed, Thomas Ludescher, Julian King, Clemens Ager, Michael Trosin, Uygar Senocak, Peter Brezany, Thomas Feilhauer, Anton Amann

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of breath research, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Ibrahim ElsayedResearch Group Scientific Computing, University of Vienna, Währinger Strasse 29, A-1090 Vienna, Austria.
Thomas Ludescher
Julian King
Clemens Ager
Michael Trosin
Uygar Senocak
Peter Brezany
Thomas Feilhauer
Anton Amann

Funding

Austrian Science Fund FWF P 24736
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This paper introduces the advanced breath analysis (ABA) platform, an innovative scientific research platform for the entire breath research domain. Within the ABA project, we are investigating novel data management concepts and semantic web technologies to document breath analysis studies for the long run as well as to enable their full automatic reproducibility. We propose several concept taxonomies (a hierarchical order of terms from a glossary of terms), which can be seen as a first step toward the definition of conceptualized terms commonly used by the international community of breath researchers. They build the basis for the development of an ontology (a concept from computer science used for communication between machines and/or humans and representation and reuse of knowledge) dedicated to breath research.

Indexed as

InternetBiomedical ResearchBreath TestsHumansReproducibility of Results

Identifiers

PMID23619467
PMCPMC4913868

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.