Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23619412›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of experimental biology2013

Visually guided gradation of prey capture movements in larval zebrafish.

Bradley W Patterson, Aliza O Abraham, Malcolm A MacIver, David L McLean

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of experimental biology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 54 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
54citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

54 citing papers in PubMed, 134 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Larval zebrafish minimize energy consumption during hunting via adaptive movement selection.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Eat, flee, freeze: Division of labor in the larval zebrafish visuomotor system.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Spinal Basis of Direction Control during Locomotion in Larval Zebrafish.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2023
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Hoverfly (Eristalis tenax) pursuit of artificial targets.The Journal of experimental biology · 2023
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Whole-brain imaging of freely-moving zebrafish.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2023
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Bradley W PattersonInterdepartmental Neuroscience Program, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL, USA.
Aliza O Abraham
Malcolm A MacIver
David L McLean
Northwestern University · US

Funding

Functional Development of Motor NetworksR01NS067299 · NINDS · NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY · PI MCLEAN, DAVID · 2010 to 2019
$4.0M
NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS067299NINDS NIH HHS R01-NS067299
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A mechanistic understanding of goal-directed behavior in vertebrates is hindered by the relative inaccessibility and size of their nervous systems. Here, we have studied the kinematics of prey capture behavior in a highly accessible vertebrate model organism, the transparent larval zebrafish (Danio rerio), to assess whether they use visual cues to systematically adjust their movements. We found that zebrafish larvae scale the speed and magnitude of turning movements according to the azimuth of one of their standard prey, paramecia. They also bias the direction of subsequent swimming movements based on prey azimuth and select forward or backward movements based on the prey's direction of travel. Once within striking distance, larvae generate either ram or suction capture behaviors depending on their distance from the prey. From our experimental estimations of ocular receptive fields, we ascertained that the ultimate decision to consume prey is likely a function of the progressive vergence of the eyes that places the target in a proximal binocular 'capture zone'. By repeating these experiments in the dark, we demonstrate that paramecia are only consumed if they contact the anterior extremities of larvae, which triggers ocular vergence and tail movements similar to close proximity captures in lit conditions. These observations confirm the importance of vision in the graded movements we observe leading up to capture of more distant prey in the light, and implicate somatosensation in captures in the absence of light. We discuss the implications of these findings for future work on the neural control of visually guided behavior in zebrafish.

Indexed as

AnimalsBiomechanical PhenomenaDarknessLarvaMotor ActivityMovementPredatory BehaviorVideo RecordingVisual PerceptionZebrafishbehaviorDanio reriokinematicsvisuomotor integration

Identifiers

PMID23619412
PMCPMC4074221
OpenAlexW2110531771

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.