Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23618318›Full record

ArticleAddiction science & clinical practice2013

Qualitative analysis of cocaine and heroin users' main partner sex-risk behavior: is safety in love safety in health?

Edward Bernstein, Valerie Ng, Lois McCloskey, Kathy Vazquez, Desiree Ashong, Stephanie Stapleton, Jasmin Cromwell, Judith Bernstein

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Addiction science & clinical practice, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01379599 (Brief Intervention to Reduce STDs in ER Drug Users), which is not on this map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01379599 phase3completednot on this map

Brief Intervention to Reduce STDs in ER Drug Users

TypeinterventionalSponsorBoston Medical CenterRan2004 to 2009Enrolled1,030ConditionsSexually Transmitted InfectionArmsbrief motivation intervention
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Edward BernsteinBoston University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA. ebernste@bu.edu
Valerie Ng
Lois McCloskey
Kathy Vazquez
Desiree Ashong
Stephanie Stapleton
Jasmin Cromwell
Judith Bernstein
Boston University · USBeth Israel Deaconess Medical Center · US

Funding

Brief Intervention to Reduce STDs in ER Drug UsersR01DA017061 · NIDA · BOSTON MEDICAL CENTER · PI BERNSTEIN, EDWARD BERNSTEIN · 2004 to 2008
$2.5M
NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA017061
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn 2009, 27% of the 48,100 estimated new cases of HIV were attributed to heterosexual contact with an infected or at-risk person. Sexually active adults are less likely to use condoms in relationships with main partners than with non-regular partners, despite general knowledge that condom use reduces HIV transmission.

methodsThe purpose of this secondary qualitative analysis was to explore and contextualize perceptions of main partnerships, HIV risk, and attitudes toward condom use within main partner relationships among a subsample of intervention-arm cocaine- and/or heroin-using patients enrolled in a negative trial of brief motivational intervention to reduce the incidence of sexually transmitted disease and unsafe sexual behaviors. The open-ended portion of these interview audiotapes consisted of questions about perceptions of risk and attitudes about condom use with main partners. Enrollees were aged 18-54, English or Spanish speaking, and included in this analysis only if they reported having a main partner. We identified codes and elaborated important themes through a standard inductive three step coding process, using HyperRESEARCH™ software.

resultsAmong 48 interviewees, 65% were male, half were non-Hispanic white, over 60% were 20-39 years of age, 58% had intravenous drug use (IDU), and 8% were HIV-positive. Participants defined respect, support, trust, and shared child-rearing responsibility as the most valued components of main partner relationships. Condom use was viewed occasionally as a positive means of showing respect with main partners but more often as a sign of disrespect and a barrier to intimacy and affection. Enrollees appraised their partners' HIV risk in terms of perceptions of physical health, cleanliness, and sexual and HIV testing history. They based decisions regarding condom use mainly on perceived faithfulness, length of involvement, availability of condoms, and pregnancy desirability.

conclusionsRisk appraisal was commonly based on appearance and subjective factors, and condom use with main sexual partners was described most often as a demonstration of lack of trust and intimacy.

trial registrationNCT01379599.

Indexed as

Risk-TakingAdolescentAdultCocaine-Related DisordersCondomsFemaleHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHeroin DependenceHIV InfectionsHumansMaleMiddle AgedMotivationQualitative ResearchSexual BehaviorSexual Partners

Identifiers

PMID23618318
PMCPMC3698184
OpenAlexW2115922325

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.