Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23618090›Full record

ArticleCanadian journal of public health = Revue canadienne de sante publique2012

Coming to consensus on policy to create supportive built environments and community design.

Kim D Raine, Nazeem Muhajarine, John C Spence, Neil E Neary, Candace I J Nykiforuk

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Canadian journal of public health = Revue canadienne de sante publique, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. A meta-study of qualitative research examining determinants of children's independent active free play.The international journal of behavioral nutrition and physical activity · 2015
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Status report, The Public Health and Planning 101 project: strengthening collaborations between the public health and planning professions.Health promotion and chronic disease prevention in Canada : research, policy and practice · 2017
    Article
  8. Active Canada 20/20: A physical activity plan for Canada.Canadian journal of public health = Revue canadienne de sante publique · 2016
    Article
  9. Healthy Canada by Design: Translating science into action and prevention.Canadian journal of public health = Revue canadienne de sante publique · 2014
    Article
  10. Application of an evidence-based tool to evaluate health impacts of changes to the built environment.Canadian journal of public health = Revue canadienne de sante publique · 2014
    Article
  11. Built environment health research: the time is now for a Canadian network of excellence.Canadian journal of public health = Revue canadienne de sante publique · 2012
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Kim D RaineCentre for Health Promotion Studies, School of Public Health, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB. kim.raine@ualberta.ca
Nazeem Muhajarine
John C Spence
Neil E Neary
Candace I J Nykiforuk

Funding

Canadian Institutes of Health Research
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In April 2011, a conference with invited experts from research, policy and practice was held to build consensus around policy levers to address environmental determinants of obesity. The gap between existing policy tools and what can promote health through community design is a major policy opportunity. This commentary represents a consensus of next actions towards creating built environments that support healthy active living. The policy environment and Canadian evidence are reviewed. Issues and challenges to policy change are discussed. Recommendations to create supportive built environments that encourage healthy active living in communities include the following: 1) empower planning authorities to change bylaws that impede healthy active living, protect and increase access to green space, introduce zoning to increase high density, mixed land use, and influence the location and distribution of food stores; 2) establish stable funding for infrastructure promoting active transportation and opportunities for recreation; 3) evaluate the effectiveness of programs to improve the built environment so that successful interventions can be identified and disseminated; 4) mandate health impact assessment of planning, development and transportation policies to ensure that legislative changes promote health and safety; 5) frame issues to dispel myths and to promote protection from obesity risk factors.

Indexed as

Consensus Statements as TopicEnvironment DesignHealth PolicyAdolescentCanadaChildHumansObesityResidence Characteristicsadolescentchildenvironment designhealth policyhealth statusobesity

Identifiers

PMID23618090
PMCPMC6973873

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.