Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23618037›Full record

ArticleJournal of ovarian research2013

Nadir CA-125 level as prognosis indicator of high-grade serous ovarian cancer.

Xia Xu, Yan Wang, Fang Wang, Lizhou Jia, Yiqin Zhou, Fei Deng, Junwei Qu, Bifang Zhou, Aifeng Meng, Bole Fu and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of ovarian research, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Guideline
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Clinical Use of Cancer Biomarkers in Epithelial Ovarian Cancer: Updated Guidelines From the European Group on Tumor Markers.International journal of gynecological cancer : official journal of the International Gynecological Cancer Society · 2016
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Xia XuDepartment of Chemotherapy, Jiangsu Cancer Hospital, Nanjing, Jiangsu 210009, PR China.
Yan WangDepartment of Pathology, Jiangsu Province Hospital on Integration of Chinese and Western Medicine, Nanjing, Jiangsu 210028, PR China.
Fang WangDepartment of Pathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA ; Research Institute of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The third Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical College, Guangzhou, Guangdong 510150, PR China.
Lizhou JiaDepartment of Pathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA.
Yiqin ZhouDepartment of Radiotherapy, Jiangsu Cancer Hospital, Nanjing, Jiangsu 210009, PR China.
Fei DengDepartment of Gynecologic Oncology, Jiangsu Cancer Hospital, Nanjing, Jiangsu 210009, PR China.
Junwei QuDepartment of Gynecologic Oncology, Jiangsu Cancer Hospital, Nanjing, Jiangsu 210009, PR China.
Bifang ZhouDepartment of Gynecologic Oncology, Jiangsu Cancer Hospital, Nanjing, Jiangsu 210009, PR China.
Aifeng MengDepartment of Nursing, Jiangsu Cancer Hospital, Nanjing, Jiangsu 210009, PR China.
Bole FuDepartment of Gynecologic Oncology, Jiangsu Cancer Hospital, Nanjing, Jiangsu 210009, PR China ; Department of Nursing, Jiangsu Cancer Hospital, Nanjing, Jiangsu 210009, PR China.
Xiaoxiang ChenDepartment of Pathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA ; Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Jiangsu Cancer Hospital, Nanjing, Jiangsu 210009, PR China ; State Key Laboratory of Bioelectronics, Southeast University, Nanjing 210096, PR China.
Zhiying QianDepartment of Chemotherapy, Jiangsu Cancer Hospital, Nanjing, Jiangsu 210009, PR China.
Jinhua WangDepartment of Gynecologic Oncology, Jiangsu Cancer Hospital, Nanjing, Jiangsu 210009, PR China.
Jiangsu Cancer Hospital · CNThe University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center · USJiangsu Province Hospital · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe capacity of nadir CA-125 levels to predict the prognosis of epithelial ovarian cancer remains controversial. This study aimed to explore whether the nadir CA-125 serum levels could predict the durations of overall survival (OS) and progression free survival (PFS) in patients with high-grade serous ovarian cancer (HG-SOC) from the USA and PRC. MATERIALS AND

methodsA total of 616 HG-SOC patients from the MD Anderson Cancer Center (MDACC, USA) between 1990 and 2011 were retrospectively analyzed. The results of 262 cases from the Jiangsu Institute of Cancer Research (JICR, PRC) between 1992 and 2011 were used to validate the MDACC data. The CA-125 immunohistochemistry assay was performed on 280 tissue specimens. The Cox proportional hazards model and the log-rank test were used to assess the associations between the clinicopathological characteristics and duration of survival.

resultsThe nadir CA-125 level was an independent predictor of OS and PFS (p < 0.01 for both) in the MDACC patients. Lower nadir CA-125 levels (≤10 U/mL) were associated with longer OS and PFS (median: 61.2 and 16.8 months with 95% CI: 52.0-72.4 and 14.0-19.6 months, respectively) than their counterparts with shorter OS and PFS (median: 49.2 and 10.5 months with 95% CI: 41.7-56.7 and 6.9-14.1 months, respectively). The nadir CA-125 levels in JICR patients were similarly independent when predicting the OS and PFS (p < 0.01 for both). Nadir CA-125 levels less than or equal to 10 U/mL were associated with longer OS and PFS (median: 59.9 and 15.5 months with 95% CI: 49.7-70.1 and 10.6-20.4 months, respectively), as compared with those more than 10 U/mL (median: 42.0 and 9.0 months with 95% CI: 34.4-49.7 and 6.6-11.2 months, respectively). Baseline serum CA-125 levels, but not the CA-125 expression in tissues, were associated with the OS and PFS of HG-SOC patients in the MDACC and JICR groups. However, these values were not independent. Nadir CA-125 levels were not associated with the tumor burden based on second-look surgery (p = 0.09). Patients who achieved a pathologic complete response had longer OS and PFS (median: 73.7 and 20.7 months with 95% CI: 63.7-83.7 and 9.5-31.9 months, respectively) than those with residual tumors (median: 34.6 and 10.6 months with 95% CI: 6.9-62.3 and 4.9-16.3 months, respectively).

conclusionsThe nadir CA-125 level was an independent predictor of OS and PFS in HG-SOC patients. Further prospective studies are required to clinically optimize the chances for a complete clinical response of HG-SOC cases with higher CA-125 levels (>10 U/mL) at the end of primary treatment.

Indexed as

CA-125Epithelial ovarian cancerHG-SOCPrognosis

Identifiers

PMID23618037
PMCPMC3644248
OpenAlexW2116553945

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.