Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23618019›Full record

ArticleCanadian journal of public health = Revue canadienne de sante publique2012

Optimizing Canadian breast cancer screening strategies: a perspective for action.

Andriana Barisic, Sharareh Taghipour, Dragan Banjevic, Anthony B Miller, Neil Montgomery, Andrew Jardine, Bart J Harvey

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Canadian journal of public health = Revue canadienne de sante publique, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 96% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Correlates of clinical breast examination among lesbian, gay, bisexual, and queer women.Canadian journal of public health = Revue canadienne de sante publique · 2016
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Andriana BarisicDalla Lana School of Public Health, Toronto, ON.
Sharareh Taghipour
Dragan Banjevic
Anthony B Miller
Neil Montgomery
Andrew Jardine
Bart J Harvey

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

While controversies regarding optimal breast cancer screening modalities, screening start and end ages, and screening frequencies continue to exist, additional population-based randomized trials are unlikely to be initiated to examine these concerns. Simulation models have been used to evaluate the efficacy and effectiveness of various breast cancer screening strategies, however these models were all developed using US data. Currently, there is a need to examine the optimal screening and treatment policies in the Canadian context. In this commentary, we discuss the current controversies pertaining to breast cancer screening, and describe the fundamental components of a simulation model, which can be used to inform breast cancer screening and treatment policies.

Indexed as

Computer SimulationEarly Detection of CancerHealth PolicyAgedBreast NeoplasmsCanadaDecision Support TechniquesDissent and DisputesFemaleHumansMiddle AgedPractice Guidelines as TopicBreast cancermodel componentsscreening controversiesscreening strategiessimulation

Identifiers

PMID23618019
PMCPMC6975208
OpenAlexW1602859749

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.