Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23617873›Full record

Trial reportThe American journal on addictions

Patient perspectives on choosing buprenorphine over methadone in an urban, equal-access system.

Jan Gryczynski, Jerome H Jaffe, Robert P Schwartz, Kristi A Dušek, Nishan Gugsa, Cristin L Monroe, Kevin E O'Grady, Yngvild K Olsen, Shannon Gwin Mitchell

Abstract readClinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in The American journal on addictions. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 46 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
46citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

46 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Jan GryczynskiFriends Research Institute, 1040 Park Avenue, Baltimore, MD 21201, USA. jgryczynski@friendsresearch.org
Jerome H Jaffe
Robert P Schwartz
Kristi A Dušek
Nishan Gugsa
Cristin L Monroe
Kevin E O'Grady
Yngvild K Olsen
Shannon Gwin Mitchell

Funding

Intensive Outpatient v. Outpatient Treatment with Buprenorphine among African AmeRC1DA028407 · NIDA · FRIENDS RESEARCH INSTITUTE, INC. · PI MITCHELL, SHANNON GWIN · 2009 to 2010
$990k
NIDA NIH HHS 1RC1DA028407NIDA NIH HHS RC1 DA028407
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRecent policy initiatives in Baltimore City, MD significantly reduced access disparities between methadone and buprenorphine in the publicly funded treatment sector.

objectivesThis study examines reasons for choosing buprenorphine over methadone among patients with access to both medications.

methodThis study was embedded within a larger clinical trial conducted at two outpatient substance abuse treatment programs offering buprenorphine. Qualitative and quantitative data on treatment choice were collected for new patients starting buprenorphine treatment (n = 80). The sample consisted of predominantly urban African American (94%) heroin users who had prior experience with non-prescribed street buprenorphine (85%), and opioid agonist treatment (68%). Qualitative data were transcribed and coded for themes, while quantitative data were analyzed using descriptive and bivariate statistics.

resultsParticipants typically conveyed their choice of buprenorphine treatment as a decision against methadone. Buprenorphine was perceived as a helpful medication while methadone was perceived as a harmful narcotic with multiple unwanted physical effects. Positive experiences with non-prescribed "street buprenorphine" were a central factor in participants' decisions to seek buprenorphine treatment.

conclusionsDifferences in service structure between methadone and buprenorphine did not strongly influence treatment-seeking decisions in this sample. Personal experiences with medications and the street narrative surrounding them play an important role in treatment selection decisions. SCIENTIFIC SIGNIFICANCE: This study characterizes important decision factors that underlie patients' selection of buprenorphine over methadone treatment.

Indexed as

Patient PreferenceAdultBaltimoreBlack or African AmericanBuprenorphineFemaleHumansIllicit DrugsMaleMethadoneMiddle AgedOpiate Substitution TreatmentOpioid-Related DisordersPrescription Drug MisuseQualitative ResearchSubstance Abuse Treatment CentersBuprenorphineIllicit DrugsMethadone

Identifiers

PMID23617873
PMCPMC4215541

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.