ArticleBMC evolutionary biology2013
Phylogenomics of strongylocentrotid sea urchins.
Article in BMC evolutionary biology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 26 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
26 citing papers in PubMed, 57 citations in OpenAlex.
- Conservation and diversity of genes expressed in the spines of the sea urchin.Genes & genomics · 2026Article
- Selection Shapes the Genomic Landscape of Introgressed Ancestry in a Pair of Sympatric Sea Urchin Species.Genome biology and evolution · 2024Article
- Article
- Extensive introgression among strongylocentrotid sea urchins revealed by phylogenomics.Ecology and evolution · 2023Article
- Early expression onset of tissue-specific effector genes during the specification process in sea urchin embryos.EvoDevo · 2023Article
- Article
- Sequence Diversity, Locus Structure, and Evolutionary History of theFrontiers in immunology · 2021Article
- Identification of Sex-Specific Markers Through 2b-RAD Sequencing in the Sea Urchin (Frontiers in genetics · 2021Article
- Article
- Sea Urchin as a Universal Model for Studies of Gene Networks.Frontiers in genetics · 2020Review
- Article
- A phylogenomic resolution of the sea urchin tree of life.BMC evolutionary biology · 2018Article
- Mind the gap! The mitochondrial control region and its power as a phylogenetic marker in echinoids.BMC evolutionary biology · 2018Article
- Iterative Calibration: A Novel Approach for Calibrating the Molecular Clock Using Complex Geological Events.Journal of molecular evolution · 2018Article
- Article
- Genome-wide signals of positive selection in strongylocentrotid sea urchins.BMC genomics · 2017Article
- Rates and relations of mitochondrial genome evolution across the Echinoidea, with special focus on the superfamily Odontophora.Ecology and evolution · 2017Article
- Article
- Erratum to: Phylogenomics of strongylocentrotid sea urchins.BMC evolutionary biology · 2017Article
- TheFrontiers in immunology · 2017Review
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundStrongylocentrotid sea urchins have a long tradition as model organisms for studying many fundamental processes in biology including fertilization, embryology, development and genome regulation but the phylogenetic relationships of the group remain largely unresolved. Although the differing isolating mechanisms of vicariance and rapidly evolving gamete recognition proteins have been proposed, a stable and robust phylogeny is unavailable.
resultsWe used a phylogenomic approach with mitochondrial and nuclear genes taking advantage of the whole-genome sequencing of nine species in the group to establish a stable (i.e. concordance in tree topology among multiple lies of evidence) and robust (i.e. high nodal support) phylogenetic hypothesis for the family Strongylocentrotidae. We generated eight draft mitochondrial genome assemblies and obtained 13 complete mitochondrial genes for each species. Consistent with previous studies, mitochondrial sequences failed to provide a reliable phylogeny. In contrast, we obtained a very well-supported phylogeny from 2301 nuclear genes without evidence of positive Darwinian selection both from the majority of most-likely gene trees and the concatenated fourfold degenerate sites: ((P. depressus, (M. nudus, M. franciscanus), (H. pulcherrimus, (S. purpuratus, (S. fragilis, (S. pallidus, (S. droebachiensis, S. intermedius)). This phylogeny was consistent with a single invasion of deep-water environments followed by a holarctic expansion by Strongylocentrotus. Divergence times for each species estimated with reference to the divergence times between the two major clades of the group suggest a correspondence in the timing with the opening of the Bering Strait and the invasion of the holarctic regions.
conclusionsNuclear genome data contains phylogenetic signal informative for understanding the evolutionary history of this group. However, mitochondrial genome data does not. Vicariance can explain major patterns observed in the phylogeny. Other isolating mechanisms are appropriate to explore in this system to help explain divergence patterns not well supported by vicariance, such as the effects of rapidly evolving gamete recognition proteins on isolating populations. Our findings of a stable and robust phylogeny, with the increase in mitochondrial and nuclear comparative genomic data, provide a system in which we can enhance our understanding of molecular evolution and adaptation in this group of sea urchins.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.