Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23617474›Full record

ReviewAJR. American journal of roentgenology2013

Pediatric CT: strategies to lower radiation dose.

Claudia Zacharias, Adam M Alessio, Randolph K Otto, Ramesh S Iyer, Grace S Philips, Jonathan O Swanson, Mahesh M Thapa

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in AJR. American journal of roentgenology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 43 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
43citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

43 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Observational
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. An Overview on the Alignment of Radiation Protection in Computed Tomography withThe Malaysian journal of medical sciences : MJMS · 2023
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Claudia ZachariasDepartment of Radiology, University of Washington, Redmond, WA, USA.
Adam M Alessio
Randolph K Otto
Ramesh S Iyer
Grace S Philips
Jonathan O Swanson
Mahesh M Thapa

Funding

Low-dose Myocardial Perfusion Imaging by CTR01HL109327 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI ALESSIO, ADAM M · 2012 to 2017
$2.2M
NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL109327
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe introduction of MDCT has increased the utilization of CT in pediatric radiology along with concerns for radiation sequelae. This article reviews general principles of lowering radiation dose, the basic physics that impact radiation dose, and specific CT integrated dose-reduction tools focused on the pediatric population.

conclusionThe goal of this article is to provide a comprehensive review of the recent literature regarding CT dose reduction methods, their limitations, and an outlook on future developments with a focus on the pediatric population. The discussion will initially focus on general considerations that lead to radiation dose reduction, followed by specific technical features that influence the radiation dose.

Indexed as

Radiation DosageBody BurdenChildFemaleHumansMalePediatricsRadiation InjuriesRadiation ProtectionRadiometryTomography, X-Ray Computed

Identifiers

PMID23617474
PMCPMC4748846

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.