Trial reportBMC musculoskeletal disorders2013
Development and validation of the patient-rated ulnar nerve evaluation.
Trial report in BMC musculoskeletal disorders, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 23 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Prospective Comparison of Techniques for Cubital Tunnel Release
Randomized Controlled Trial of Supercharged End-to-Side (SETS) Anterior Interosseous Nerve Transfer for Severe Cubital Tunnel Syndrome
Who cites it
23 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 61 citations in OpenAlex.
- Analysis of outcome reporting in sciatic neuropathy studies: a systematic review of the literature.Acta neurochirurgica · 2024Pooled it
- Analysis of outcome reporting in common peroneal neuropathy studies: a systematic review of the literature.Acta neurochirurgica · 2023Pooled it
- Functional and electrophysiological outcomes following surgical treatment of cubitus varus associated with tardy ulnar nerve palsy: A case series.Shoulder & elbow · 2026Article
- Outcomes of Revision UCL Repair With Internal Brace for Failure of Primary UCL Reconstruction in Professional and Collegiate Baseball Pitchers: A First Look.Orthopaedic journal of sports medicine · 2026Article
- Article
- Short-term symptom aggravation after cubital tunnel decompression: Clinical features and mechanistic insights from a retrospective cohort study.Neurosurgical review · 2026Article
- Translation, Cross-Cultural Adaptation, and Psychometric Validation of the Persian Version of the Patient-Rated Ulnar Nerve Evaluation (PRUNE).The archives of bone and joint surgery · 2026Article
- Overall Health Status of Patients with Mild-to-Moderate Cubital Tunnel Syndrome: A Case-Control Study.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- A prospective study of predictors of return to work after surgery for ulnar nerve entrapment.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Developing a Consensus-Based Core Set of Outcome Measures for Ulnar Nerve Surgery: A Delphi Study With Focus on the Supercharged End-to-Side Anterior Interosseous Nerve to Ulnar Nerve Transfer.Journal of hand surgery global online · 2025Article
- Systematic review of measurement properties of patient-reported outcome measures in patients with elbow-related orthopedic conditions.JSES reviews, reports, and techniques · 2025Review
- Translation and Validation of the Swedish Patient-Rated Ulnar Nerve Evaluation in Ulnar Nerve Entrapment.Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open · 2025Article
- Comparison of Patient-Reported Outcome Instruments in the Preoperative Evaluation of Cubital Tunnel Syndrome.Journal of hand surgery global online · 2025Article
- Comprehensive Assessment of Specific Patient-Reported Outcome Measures for Hand and Wrist Conditions in Adults: A Scoping Review.JPRAS open · 2025Article
- Novel Technique for Ulnar Nerve Transposition at the Elbow: The Neocubital Tunnel.Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open · 2024Article
- The Unpredictable Ulnar Nerve-Ulnar Nerve Entrapment from Anatomical, Pathophysiological, and Biopsychosocial Aspects.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Computerized adaptive testing for the patient evaluation measure (PEM) in patients undergoing cubital tunnel syndrome surgery.The Journal of hand surgery, European volume · 2023Article
- Factors Associated With Severity of Cubital Tunnel Syndrome at Presentation.Hand (New York, N.Y.) · 2023Article
- Research reporting in cubital tunnel syndrome studies: an analysis of the literature.Acta neurochirurgica · 2022Review
- Cubital tunnel syndrome.EFORT open reviews · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundCompression neuropathy at the elbow causes substantial pain and disability. Clinical research on this disorder is hampered by the lack of a specific outcome measure for this problem. A patient-reported outcome measure, The Patient-Rated Ulnar Nerve Evaluation (PRUNE) was developed to assess pain, symptoms and functional disability in patients with ulnar nerve compression at the elbow.
methodsAn iterative process was used to develop and test items. Content validity was addressed using patient/expert interviews and review; linking of the scale items to International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health (ICF) codes; and cognitive coding of the items. Psychometric analysis of data collected from 89 patients was evaluated. Patients completed a longer version of the PRUNE at baseline. Item reduction was performed using statistical analyses and patient input to obtain the final 20 item version. Score distribution, reliability, exploratory factor analysis, correlational construct validity, discriminative known group construct validity, and responsiveness to change were evaluated.
resultsContent analysis indicated items were aligned with subscale concepts of pain and sensory/motor symptoms impairments; specific upper extremity-related tasks; and that the usual function subscale provided a broad view of self-care, household tasks, major life areas and recreation/ leisure. Four subscales were demonstrated by factor analysis (pain, sensory/motor symptoms impairments, specific activity limitations, and usual activity/role restrictions). The PRUNE and its subscales had high reliability coefficients (ICCs>0.90; 0.98 for total score) and low absolute error. The minimal detectable change was 7.1 points. It was able to discriminate between clinically meaningful subgroups determined by an independent evaluation assessing work status, residual symptoms, motor recovery, sensory recovery and global improvement) p<0.01. Responsiveness was excellent (SRM=1.55).
conclusionThe PRUNE is a brief, open-access, patient-reported outcome measure for patients with ulnar nerve compression that demonstrates strong measurement properties.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.