Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23617245›Full record

ArticleHealth expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy2015

Women's perspectives are required to inform the development of maternal obesity services: a qualitative study of obese pregnant women's experiences.

Nicola Heslehurst, Sarah Russell, Helene Brandon, Camilla Johnston, Carolyn Summerbell, Judith Rankin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Structural weight stigma in healthcare toward preconception, pregnant, and postpartum women: A systematic review.Obesity reviews : an official journal of the International Association for the Study of Obesity · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Weight stigma in the preconception, pregnancy, and postpartum periods: A systematic review of women's perspectives.Obesity reviews : an official journal of the International Association for the Study of Obesity · 2025
    Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Being targeted as a "severely overweight pregnant woman" -A qualitative interview study.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2018
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Seeing it through their eyes: a qualitative study of the pregnancy experiences of women with a body mass index of 30 or more.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2016
    Article
  18. Observational
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Nicola HeslehurstNewcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.
Sarah RussellTeesside University, Middlesbrough, UK.
Helene BrandonGateshead Health NHS Foundation Trust, Gateshead, UK.
Camilla JohnstonGateshead Health NHS Foundation Trust, Gateshead, UK.
Carolyn SummerbellDurham University, Stockton on Tees.
Judith RankinInstitute of Health & Society, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.

Funding

Department of Health PDF-2011-04-034Medical Research Council MR/K02325X/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIncreasing maternal obesity trends and accompanying risks have led to the development of guidelines internationally. However, the evidence-base is poor for effective intervention, and there is a lack of representation from the perspective of obese pregnant women in guidelines. Women's engagement with weight management support services is low.

objectiveTo explore obese pregnant women's experiences to better understand factors which need to be considered when developing services that women will find acceptable and utilize. POPULATION: Obese women referred to an antenatal dietetic service in the Northeast of England, UK.

methodsLow-structured depth-interviews allowed women to freely discuss their own experiences. Discussion prompts were included; however, issues that women raised were explored thoroughly. Women summarized what they considered most important to ensure the analyses placed appropriate emphasis on factors women perceived as important. Thematic analysis identified common themes. Saturation was confirmed after 15 interviews.

resultsKey issues included: women's weight; families; experience of negativity; and priorities and desired outcomes. These combined represented women's perspectives of issues which they considered important and integral to their lived experience of being obese and pregnant. The theme incorporates women's pregnancy-related experiences, as well as life experiences which contributed to how they felt about their weight during pregnancy.

conclusionsThere are strong associations with women's lived experiences and engagement with antenatal weight management services. Incorporating women's perspectives in the development of these services could encourage engagement by focussing on women's priorities and motivations, while taking into consideration their socially related experiences in addition to their clinical health needs.

Indexed as

Maternal Health ServicesPatient PreferenceAdultFemaleHumansInterviews as TopicNutritionistsObesityPregnancyPregnancy ComplicationsQualitative ResearchRisk FactorsSocial StigmaUnited KingdomWeight Gainexperiencesmaternalobesitypregnancyqualitative

Identifiers

PMID23617245
PMCPMC5060880

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.