ArticleBMC bioinformatics2013
An efficient algorithm to perform multiple testing in epistasis screening.
Article in BMC bioinformatics, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed.
- Leveraging the genetic correlation between traits improves the detection of epistasis in genome-wide association studies.G3 (Bethesda, Md.) · 2023Article
- DeepCOMBI: explainable artificial intelligence for the analysis and discovery in genome-wide association studies.NAR genomics and bioinformatics · 2021Article
- Empowering individual trait prediction using interactions for precision medicine.BMC bioinformatics · 2021Article
- Modified entropy-based procedure detects gene-gene-interactions in unconventional genetic models.BMC medical genomics · 2020Article
- Genetic Modifiers and Rare Mendelian Disease.Genes · 2020Review
- Comparative performances of machine learning methods for classifying Crohn Disease patients using genome-wide genotyping data.Scientific reports · 2019Article
- How to increase our belief in discovered statistical interactions via large-scale association studies?Human genetics · 2019Review
- Male-specific epistasis between WWC1 and TLN2 genes is associated with Alzheimer's disease.Neurobiology of aging · 2018Article
- LAMPLINK: detection of statistically significant SNP combinations from GWAS data.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2016Article
- Functional Regression Models for Epistasis Analysis of Multiple Quantitative Traits.PLoS genetics · 2016Article
- A roadmap to multifactor dimensionality reduction methods.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2016Review
- A cautionary note on the impact of protocol changes for genome-wide association SNP × SNP interaction studies: an example on ankylosing spondylitis.Human genetics · 2015Article
- gammaMAXT: a fast multiple-testing correction algorithm.BioData mining · 2015Article
- Detecting epistasis in human complex traits.Nature reviews. Genetics · 2014Review
- Practical aspects of genome-wide association interaction analysis.Human genetics · 2014Review
- Challenges and opportunities in genome-wide environmental interaction (GWEI) studies.Human genetics · 2012Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundResearch in epistasis or gene-gene interaction detection for human complex traits has grown over the last few years. It has been marked by promising methodological developments, improved translation efforts of statistical epistasis to biological epistasis and attempts to integrate different omics information sources into the epistasis screening to enhance power. The quest for gene-gene interactions poses severe multiple-testing problems. In this context, the maxT algorithm is one technique to control the false-positive rate. However, the memory needed by this algorithm rises linearly with the amount of hypothesis tests. Gene-gene interaction studies will require a memory proportional to the squared number of SNPs. A genome-wide epistasis search would therefore require terabytes of memory. Hence, cache problems are likely to occur, increasing the computation time. In this work we present a new version of maxT, requiring an amount of memory independent from the number of genetic effects to be investigated. This algorithm was implemented in C++ in our epistasis screening software MBMDR-3.0.3. We evaluate the new implementation in terms of memory efficiency and speed using simulated data. The software is illustrated on real-life data for Crohn's disease.
resultsIn the case of a binary (affected/unaffected) trait, the parallel workflow of MBMDR-3.0.3 analyzes all gene-gene interactions with a dataset of 100,000 SNPs typed on 1000 individuals within 4 days and 9 hours, using 999 permutations of the trait to assess statistical significance, on a cluster composed of 10 blades, containing each four Quad-Core AMD Opteron(tm) Processor 2352 2.1 GHz. In the case of a continuous trait, a similar run takes 9 days. Our program found 14 SNP-SNP interactions with a multiple-testing corrected p-value of less than 0.05 on real-life Crohn's disease (CD) data.
conclusionsOur software is the first implementation of the MB-MDR methodology able to solve large-scale SNP-SNP interactions problems within a few days, without using much memory, while adequately controlling the type I error rates. A new implementation to reach genome-wide epistasis screening is under construction. In the context of Crohn's disease, MBMDR-3.0.3 could identify epistasis involving regions that are well known in the field and could be explained from a biological point of view. This demonstrates the power of our software to find relevant phenotype-genotype higher-order associations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.