Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23617228›Full record

Trial reportThe journal of maternal-fetal & neonatal medicine : the official journal of the European Association of Perinatal Medicine, the Federation of Asia and Oceania Perinatal Societies, the International Society of Perinatal Obstetricians2014

A randomized trial comparing perinatal outcomes using insulin detemir or neutral protamine Hagedorn in type 1 diabetes.

Moshe Hod, Elisabeth R Mathiesen, Lois Jovanovič, David R McCance, Marina Ivanisevic, Santiago Durán-Garcia, Lise Brøndsted, Avideh Nazeri, Peter Damm

Registry-linked trialOpen access · bronzeAbstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in The journal of maternal-fetal & neonatal medicine : the official journal of the European Association of Perinatal Medicine, the Federation of Asia and Oceania Perinatal Societies, the International Society of Perinatal Obstetricians, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT00474045 (A Randomised, Parallel-group, Open-labelled, Multinational Trial Comparing the Efficacy and Safety of Insulin Detemir), which is not on this map. Cited by 35 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
6.5field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT00474045 phase3completednot on this map

A Randomised, Parallel-group, Open-labelled, Multinational Trial Comparing the Efficacy and Safety of Insulin Detemir (Levemir®) Versus Human Insulin (NPH Insulin), Used in Combination With Insulin Aspart as Bolus Insulin, in the Treatment of Pregnant Women With Type 1 Diabetes

TypeinterventionalSponsorNovo Nordisk A/SRan2007 to 2010Enrolled470ConditionsDiabetes, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1Armsinsulin detemir, NPH insulin, insulin aspart
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 98 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Effectiveness of Insulin Analogs Compared with Human Insulins in Pregnant Women with Diabetes Mellitus: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.Revista brasileira de ginecologia e obstetricia : revista da Federacao Brasileira das Sociedades de Ginecologia e Obstetricia · 2019
    Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Insulin glargine 300 U/mL safety data in pregnancy.Diabetes, obesity & metabolism · 2025
    Article
  7. Insulin Use During Gestational and Pre-existing Diabetes in Pregnancy: A Systematic Review of Study Design.Diabetes therapy : research, treatment and education of diabetes and related disorders · 2024
    Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Observational
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 6 institutions in 5 countries.

Moshe HodHelen Schneider Women's Hospital, Rabin Medical Center, Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University , Tel Aviv , Israel .
Elisabeth R Mathiesen
Lois Jovanovič
David R McCance
Marina Ivanisevic
Santiago Durán-Garcia
Lise Brøndsted
Avideh Nazeri
Peter Damm
Novo Nordisk (Denmark) · DKUniversity of Copenhagen · DKHospital Universitario de Valme · ESSansum Diabetes Research Institute · USTel Aviv University · ILUniversity Hospital Centre Zagreb · HR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThis randomized controlled trial aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of insulin detemir (IDet) with neutral protamine Hagedorn (NPH), both with insulin aspart, in pregnant women with type 1 diabetes. The perinatal and obstetric pregnancy outcomes are presented.

methodsSubjects were randomized to IDet (n = 152) or NPH (n = 158) ≤12 months before pregnancy or at 8-12 gestational weeks.

resultsFor IDet and NPH, there were 128 and 136 live births, 11 and 9 early fetal losses, and two and one perinatal deaths, respectively. Gestational age at delivery was greater for children from the IDet arm than the NPH arm (treatment difference: 0.49 weeks [95% CI 0.11;0.88], p = 0.012, linear regression). Sixteen children had a malformation (IDet: n = 8/142, 5.6%; NPH: n = 8/145, 5.5%). The incidence of adverse events was similar between treatments.

conclusionIDet is as well tolerated as NPH as regards perinatal outcomes in pregnant women with type 1 diabetes and no safety issues were identified.

Indexed as

Pregnancy OutcomeAbortion, InducedAbortion, SpontaneousCongenital AbnormalitiesDiabetes Mellitus, Type 1Drug CombinationsFemaleFetal DeathGestational AgeHumansHypoglycemic AgentsInsulin AspartInsulin DetemirInsulin, IsophaneInsulin, Long-ActingLive BirthDrug CombinationsHypoglycemic AgentsInsulin AspartInsulin DetemirInsulin, IsophaneInsulin, Long-Acting

Identifiers

PMID23617228
PMCPMC3862070
OpenAlexW2094987273

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.