GuidelineCanadian journal of gastroenterology = Journal canadien de gastroenterologie2013
Colorectal cancer surveillance after index colonoscopy: guidance from the Canadian Association of Gastroenterology.
Guideline in Canadian journal of gastroenterology = Journal canadien de gastroenterologie, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04889352 (Optimizing Timing of Follow-up Colonoscopy), which is not on this map. Cited by 20 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Optimizing Timing of Follow-up Colonoscopy: A Pilot Cluster Randomized Trial to Test the Utility of a Knowledge Translation Tool
Who cites it
20 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 45 citations in OpenAlex.
- Systematic review of shared decision-making in guidelines about colorectal cancer screening.European journal of cancer care · 2022Pooled it
- Colorectal cancer screening for patients with a family history of colorectal cancer or adenomas.Canadian family physician Medecin de famille canadien · 2019Pooled it
- DCVBin: a novel binning method for single-sample metagenomes based on DNA language model and variational autoencoder.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2026Article
- Serrated Polyps in Inflammatory Bowel Disease Indicate a Similar Risk of Metachronous Colorectal Neoplasia as in the General Population.Digestive diseases and sciences · 2024Article
- The impact on clinical outcomes and healthcare resources from discontinuing colonoscopy surveillance subsequent to low-risk adenoma removal: A simulation study using the OncoSim-Colorectal model.Journal of medical screening · 2024Article
- Large serrated polyps indicate a greater risk of advanced metachronous colorectal neoplasia than high-grade adenomas.Endoscopy international open · 2023Article
- Rates of synchronous advanced neoplasia and colorectal cancer in patients with colonic serrated lesions.Surgical endoscopy · 2023Article
- Clinician based decision tool to guide recommended interval between colonoscopies: development and evaluation pilot study.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2022Article
- Multivariable models for advanced colorectal neoplasms in screen-eligible individuals at low-to-moderate risk of colorectal cancer: towards improving colonoscopy prioritization.BMC gastroenterology · 2021Article
- Association Between Age and Complications After Outpatient Colonoscopy.JAMA network open · 2020Article
- Rapid recommendations: Updates from 2019 guidelines: part 1.Canadian family physician Medecin de famille canadien · 2020Article
- Comparison of the Boston Bowel Preparation Scale with an Auditable Application of the US Multi-Society Task Force Guidelines.Journal of the Canadian Association of Gastroenterology · 2019Article
- Traditional serrated adenoma: an overview of pathology and emphasis on molecular pathogenesis.BMJ open gastroenterology · 2019Review
- Validating bowel preparation scales.Endoscopy international open · 2017Article
- The Serrated Polyp Pathway: Is It Time to Alter Surveillance Guidelines?Current gastroenterology reports · 2017Review
- Assessment of a Colonoscopy Triage Sheet for Use in a Province-Wide Population-Based Colorectal Screening Program.Canadian journal of gastroenterology & hepatology · 2016Article
- Colonoscopy in Colorectal Cancer Screening: Current Aspects.Indian journal of surgical oncology · 2015Review
- Predicting the risk of recurrent adenoma and incident colorectal cancer based on findings of the baseline colonoscopy.Clinical and translational gastroenterology · 2014Article
- Serrated polyps and polyposis of the colon: a brief review for surgeon endoscopists.Canadian journal of surgery. Journal canadien de chirurgieReview
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 7 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundDifferences between American (United States [US]) and European guidelines for colonoscopy surveillance may create confusion for the practicing clinician. Under- or overutilization of surveillance colonoscopy can impact patient care.
methodsThe Canadian Association of Gastroenterology (CAG) convened a working group (CAG-WG) to review available guidelines and provide unified guidance to Canadian clinicians regarding appropriate follow-up for colorectal cancer (CRC) surveillance after index colonoscopy. A literature search was conducted for relevant data that postdated the published guidelines.
resultsThe CAG-WG chose the 2012 US Multi-Society Task Force (MSTF) on Colorectal Cancer to serve as the basis for the Canadian position, primarily because the US approach was the simplest and comprehensively addressed the issue of serrated polyps. Aspects of other guidelines were incorporated where relevant. The CAG-WG recommendations differed from the US MSTF guidelines in three main areas: patients with negative index colonoscopy should be followed-up at 10 years using any of the appropriate screening tests, including colonoscopy, for average-risk individuals; among patients with >10 adenomas, a one-year interval for subsequent colonoscopy is recommended; and for long-term follow-up, patients with low-risk adenomas on both the index and first follow-up procedures can undergo second follow-up colonoscopy at an interval of five to 10 years. DISCUSSION: The CAG-WG adapted the US MSTF guidelines for colonoscopy surveillance to the Canadian health care environment with a few modifications. It is anticipated that the present article will provide unified guidance that will enhance physician acceptance and encourage appropriate utilization of recommended surveillance intervals.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.