ArticleApplied clinical informatics2010
Concept and Implementation of a Single Source Information System in Nuclear Medicine for Myocardial Scintigraphy (SPECT-CT data).
Article in Applied clinical informatics, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Conceptual Design, Implementation, and Evaluation of Generic and Standard-Compliant Data Transfer into Electronic Health Records.Applied clinical informatics · 2020Article
- Review of Developments in Electronic, Clinical Data Collection, and Documentation Systems over the Last Decade - Are We Ready for Big Data in Routine Health Care?Frontiers in oncology · 2016Review
- HIS-Based Support of Follow-Up Documentation - Concept and Implementation for Clinical Studies.Applied clinical informatics · 2011Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveData for clinical documentation and medical research are usually managed in separate systems. We developed, implemented and assessed a documentation system for myocardial scintigraphy (SPECT/CT-data) in order to integrate clinical and research documentation. This paper presents concept, implementation and evaluation of this single source system including methods to improve data quality by plausibility checks.
methodsWe analyzed the documentation process for myocardial scintigraphy, especially for collecting medical history, symptoms and medication as well as stress and rest injection protocols. Corresponding electronic forms were implemented in our hospital information system (HIS) including plausibility checks to support correctness and completeness of data entry. Research data can be extracted from routine data by dedicated HIS reports.
resultsA single source system based on HIS-electronic documentation merges clinical and scientific documentation and thus avoids multiple documentation. Within nine months 495 patients were documented with our system by 8 physicians and 6 radiographers (466 medical history protocols, 466 stress and 414 rest injection protocols). Documentation consists of 295 attributes, three quarters are conditional items. Data quality improved substantially compared to previous paper-based documentation.
conclusionA single source system to collect routine and research data for myocardial scintigraphy is feasible in a real-world setting and can generate high-quality data through online plausibility checks.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.