ArticleFrontiers in neural circuits2013
Controlling the oscillation phase through precisely timed closed-loop optogenetic stimulation: a computational study.
Article in Frontiers in neural circuits, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
30 citing papers in PubMed.
- Bridging Model and Experiment in Systems Neuroscience with Cleo: The Closed-Loop, Electrophysiology, and Optophysiology Simulation Testbed.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2026Article
- Phase-dependent stimulation response is shaped by the brain's dynamic functional connectivity.Network neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2026Article
- Bridging model and experiment in systems neuroscience with Cleo: the Closed-Loop, Electrophysiology, and Optophysiology simulation testbed.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- Article
- Unraveling Sex Differences in Affect Processing: Unique Oscillatory Signaling Dynamics in the Infralimbic Cortex and Nucleus Accumbens Shell.Biological psychiatry global open science · 2024Article
- Simulations predict differing phase responses to excitation vs. inhibition in theta-resonant pyramidal neurons.Journal of neurophysiology · 2023Article
- Controlling neocortical epileptic seizures using forced temporal spike-time stimulation: anFrontiers in computational neuroscience · 2023Article
- Phase-locking patterns underlying effective communication in exact firing rate models of neural networks.PLoS computational biology · 2022Article
- Article
- Paradoxical phase response of gamma rhythms facilitates their entrainment in heterogeneous networks.PLoS computational biology · 2021Article
- A user-friendly algorithm for adaptive closed-loop phase-locked stimulation.Journal of neuroscience methods · 2021Article
- Relations between large-scale brain connectivity and effects of regional stimulation depend on collective dynamical state.PLoS computational biology · 2020Article
- Excitatory/Inhibitory Responses Shape Coherent Neuronal Dynamics Driven by Optogenetic Stimulation in the Primate Brain.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2020Article
- Models of communication and control for brain networks: distinctions, convergence, and future outlook.Network neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2020Article
- Closed-loop control of gamma oscillations in the amygdala demonstrates their role in spatial memory consolidation.Nature communications · 2019Article
- Causally Investigating Cortical Dynamics and Signal Processing by Targeting Natural System Attractors With Precisely Timed (Electrical) Stimulation.Frontiers in computational neuroscience · 2019Article
- Article
- Optogenetic Entrainment of Hippocampal Theta Oscillations in Behaving Mice.Journal of visualized experiments : JoVE · 2018Article
- Flexible information routing by transient synchrony.Nature neuroscience · 2017Article
- Emergence of coupling-induced oscillations and broken symmetries in heterogeneously driven nonlinear reaction networks.Scientific reports · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Dynamic oscillatory coherence is believed to play a central role in flexible communication between brain circuits. To test this communication-through-coherence hypothesis, experimental protocols that allow a reliable control of phase-relations between neuronal populations are needed. In this modeling study, we explore the potential of closed-loop optogenetic stimulation for the control of functional interactions mediated by oscillatory coherence. The theory of non-linear oscillators predicts that the efficacy of local stimulation will depend not only on the stimulation intensity but also on its timing relative to the ongoing oscillation in the target area. Induced phase-shifts are expected to be stronger when the stimulation is applied within specific narrow phase intervals. Conversely, stimulations with the same or even stronger intensity are less effective when timed randomly. Stimulation should thus be properly phased with respect to ongoing oscillations (in order to optimally perturb them) and the timing of the stimulation onset must be determined by a real-time phase analysis of simultaneously recorded local field potentials (LFPs). Here, we introduce an electrophysiologically calibrated model of Channelrhodopsin 2 (ChR2)-induced photocurrents, based on fits holding over two decades of light intensity. Through simulations of a neural population which undergoes coherent gamma oscillations-either spontaneously or as an effect of continuous optogenetic driving-we show that precisely-timed photostimulation pulses can be used to shift the phase of oscillation, even at transduction rates smaller than 25%. We consider then a canonic circuit with two inter-connected neural populations oscillating with gamma frequency in a phase-locked manner. We demonstrate that photostimulation pulses applied locally to a single population can induce, if precisely phased, a lasting reorganization of the phase-locking pattern and hence modify functional interactions between the two populations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.