Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23616389›Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of medical genetics. Part A2013

Interrater reliability of a phenotypic assessment tool for the ear morphology in microtia.

Daniela V Luquetti, Babette S Saltzman, Kathleen C Sie, Craig B Birgfeld, Brian G Leroux, Kelly N Evans, James M Smartt, David D Tieu, Daniel J Dudley, Carrie L Heike

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of medical genetics. Part A, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Correlations between click-ABR / PTA outcomes and temporal bone malformation characteristics in patients with congenital aural atresia.European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Daniela V LuquettiDepartment of Pediatrics, University of Washington, and Craniofacial Center, Seattle Children's Hospital, Seattle, Washington 98101, USA. daniela.luquetti@seattlechildrens.org
Babette S Saltzman
Kathleen C Sie
Craig B Birgfeld
Brian G Leroux
Kelly N Evans
James M Smartt
David D Tieu
Daniel J Dudley
Carrie L Heike

Funding

Phenotypic and Genomic Characterization of Microtia in the Andean PopulationK99DC011282 · NIDCD · SEATTLE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL · PI LUQUETTI, DANIELA VARELA · 2011 to 2012
$204k
NIDCD NIH HHS K99 DC011282NIDCD NIH HHS K99DC011282
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Elements of Morphology Standard Terminology working group published standardized definitions for external ear morphology. The primary objective of our study was to use these descriptions to evaluate the interrater reliability for specific features associated with microtia. We invited six raters from three different subspecialities to rate 100 ear photographs on 32 features. We calculated overall and within specialty and professional experience intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) and 95% confidence intervals. A total of 600 possible observations were recorded for each feature. The overall interrater reliability ranged from 0.04 (95% CI: 0.00-0.14) for the width of the antihelix inferior crus to 0.93 (95% CI: 0.91-0.95) for the presence of the inferior crux of the antihelix. The reliability for quantitative characteristics such as length or width of an ear structure was generally lower than the reliability for qualitative characteristics (e.g., presence or absence of an ear structure). Categories with very poor interrater reliability included anti-helix inferior crux width (0.04, 95% CI: 0.00-0.14), crux helix extension (0.17, 95% CI 0.00-0.37), and shape of the incisura (0.14, 95% CI: 0.01-0.27). There were no significant differences in reliability estimates by specialty or professional experience for most variables. Our study showed that it is feasible to systematically characterize many of structures of the ear that are affected in microtia. We incorporated these descriptions into a standardized phenotypic assessment tool (PAT-Microtia) that might be used in multicenter research studies to identify sub-phenotypes for future studies of microtia.

Indexed as

Terminology as TopicAdolescentAnthropometryChildChild, PreschoolCongenital MicrotiaEar, ExternalFemaleHumansInfantInfant, NewbornMaleObserver VariationPhenotypeReproducibility of Results

Identifiers

PMID23616389
PMCPMC3664118

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.