Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23616154›Full record

Trial reportNeurology2013

Effect of 4-aminopyridine on vision in multiple sclerosis patients with optic neuropathy.

Lindsay Horton, Amy Conger, Darrel Conger, Gina Remington, Teresa Frohman, Elliot Frohman, Benjamin Greenberg

Open access · bronzeAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Neurology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
3.7field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 44 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Fampridine improves acute optic neuritis contributing to a long-lasting recovery of nerve function.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2021
    Article
  7. Neuroprotective Properties of 4-Aminopyridine.Neurology(R) neuroimmunology & neuroinflammation · 2021
    Review
  8. Review
  9. Evolution of Visual Outcomes in Clinical Trials for Multiple Sclerosis Disease-Modifying Therapies.Journal of neuro-ophthalmology : the official journal of the North American Neuro-Ophthalmology Society · 2018
    Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Observational
  16. Article
  17. Aquatic training in MS: neurotherapeutic impact upon quality of life.Annals of clinical and translational neurology · 2015
    Article
  18. Review
  19. The node of Ranvier in CNS pathology.Acta neuropathologica · 2014
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Lindsay HortonFrDepartment of Neurology and Neurotherapeutics, The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center at Dallas, Dallas, USA.
Amy Conger
Darrel Conger
Gina Remington
Teresa Frohman
Elliot Frohman
Benjamin Greenberg
Southwestern Medical Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe objective of this randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover study was to examine if patients with optic neuropathy would derive a therapeutic benefit from 4-aminopyridine (4-AP) treatment. Furthermore, the study was intended to determine if patients with certain P100 latencies or retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) measures would be more likely to respond to therapy.

methodsPatients were enrolled in a randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind, crossover study of 10 weeks duration. Patients underwent visual evoked potentials (VEP), optical coherence tomography (OCT), and visual acuity before starting 5 weeks of either placebo or 4-AP. After 5 weeks, they completed a second evaluation (VEP, OCT, and visual acuity) and were crossed over between treatment arms. Five weeks later, they had their final evaluation. All investigators were blinded to treatment arm until after data analysis.

resultsOn average, patients had faster P100s on 4-AP when compared to placebo. A subset of patients had distinct responses to 4-AP as measured by improvements in visual acuity. Finally, eyes with an RNFL measure between 60 and 80 µm had the highest response rate.

conclusions4-Aminopyridine is useful for improving vision in patients with demyelinating optic neuropathy. Future clinical trials may be able to enrich a patient population for potential responders using OCT and VEP measures. Selecting patients for future trials should use RNFL measures as part of inclusion/exclusion criteria. CLASSIFICATION OF EVIDENCE: This study provides Class IV evidence supporting the use of 4-AP in certain patients with optic neuropathy to improve visual function (patients with RNFL between 60 and 80 µm).

Indexed as

4-AminopyridineAdolescentAdultAgedCross-Over StudiesDouble-Blind MethodFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedMultiple SclerosisOptic Nerve DiseasesPilot ProjectsProspective StudiesTreatment OutcomeVision, Ocular4-Aminopyridine

Identifiers

PMID23616154
PMCPMC3908347
OpenAlexW2155680556

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.