ArticleThe European journal of health economics : HEPAC : health economics in prevention and care2014
Cost-effectiveness of injectable disease-modifying therapies for the treatment of relapsing forms of multiple sclerosis in Spain.
Article in The European journal of health economics : HEPAC : health economics in prevention and care, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 21 citations in OpenAlex.
- Modeling Approaches in Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Disease-Modifying Therapies for Relapsing-Remitting Multiple Sclerosis: An Updated Systematic Review and Recommendations for Future Economic Evaluations.PharmacoEconomics · 2018Pooled it
- Disease-Modifying Therapies for Multiple Sclerosis: A Systematic Literature Review of Cost-Effectiveness Studies.PharmacoEconomics · 2018Pooled it
- Cost-utility and cost-effectiveness analysis of disease-modifying drugs of relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis: a systematic review.Health economics review · 2024Review
- How have Economic Evaluations in Relapsing Multiple Sclerosis Evolved Over Time? A Systematic Literature Review.Neurology and therapy · 2021Review
- Pegylated versus non-pegylated interferon beta 1a in patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis: A cost-effectiveness analysis.Iranian journal of neurology · 2018Article
- Cost-Effectiveness Modeling in Multiple Sclerosis: Playing Around with Non-Healthcare Costs?PharmacoEconomics · 2015Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 4 institutions in 4 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo compare the cost-effectiveness of injectable disease-modifying therapies (DMTs) for the first-line treatment of relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS) in Spain.
methodsA Markov model was developed to estimate the cost-effectiveness of intramuscular interferon beta-1a (IM IFNβ-1a), subcutaneous interferon beta-1a (SC IFNβ-1a), interferon beta-1b (IFNβ-1b) and glatiramer acetate (GA) relative to best supportive care in a hypothetical cohort of 1,000 RRMS patients in Spain. The model was developed from a societal perspective with a time horizon of 30 years. Natural history and clinical trial data were used to model relapse rates and disease progression. Cost and utility data were obtained from a published survey of multiple sclerosis patients in Spain. The primary outcome measure was cost per quality-adjusted life year (QALY) gained. Univariate and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were performed.
resultsCompared to best supportive care, the base case cost-effectiveness was <euro>168,629 per QALY gained for IM IFNβ-1a, <euro>231,853 per QALY gained for IFNβ-1b, <euro>295,638 per QALY gained for SC IFNβ-1a, and <euro>318,818 per QALY gained for GA. Results were most sensitive to changes in DMT cost, utility values and treatment effect.
conclusionsIn our cost-effectiveness analysis of first-line injectable DMTs in Spain, we found IM IFNβ-1a to be more cost-effective than SC IFNβ-1a, IFNβ-1b or GA. Sensitivity analyses confirmed the robustness of these results.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.