ArticleJournal of medical Internet research2013
A systematic self-certification model for mobile medical apps.
Article in Journal of medical Internet research, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
27 citing papers in PubMed.
- Validation and selection of criteria for evaluating apps for managing depression: a Delphi study.BMJ open · 2025Article
- A scale to measure the perceived quality of mHealth by elderly patients with hypertension in China.BMC health services research · 2023Article
- Assessing the Quality and Impact of eHealth Tools: Systematic Literature Review and Narrative Synthesis.JMIR human factors · 2023Review
- Evaluation criteria for health apps supporting medication adherence in early-stage technology development - a scoping review.German medical science : GMS e-journal · 2023Article
- Mobile Health Apps That Act as Surgical Preparatory Guides: App Store Search and Quality Evaluation.JMIR perioperative medicine · 2021Article
- Quality Principles of App Description Texts and Their Significance in Deciding to Use Health Apps as Assessed by Medical Students: Survey Study.JMIR mHealth and uHealth · 2019Article
- Mobile Apps for Management of Tinnitus: Users' Survey, Quality Assessment, and Content Analysis.JMIR mHealth and uHealth · 2019Article
- Utilization of Smartphone Applications by Anesthesia Providers.Anesthesiology research and practice · 2018Article
- Digital Platforms in the Assessment and Monitoring of Patients with Bipolar Disorder.Brain sciences · 2017Review
- 'Can you recommend any good STI apps?' A review of content, accuracy and comprehensiveness of current mobile medical applications for STIs and related genital infections.Sexually transmitted infections · 2017Article
- Article
- A survey of eMedia-delivered interventions for schizophrenia used in randomized controlled trials.Neuropsychiatric disease and treatment · 2017Article
- Educational Tools: Thinking Outside the Box.Clinical journal of the American Society of Nephrology : CJASN · 2016Review
- Interrater Reliability of mHealth App Rating Measures: Analysis of Top Depression and Smoking Cessation Apps.JMIR mHealth and uHealth · 2016Article
- Mobile telephone apps in mental health practice: uses, opportunities and challenges.BJPsych bulletin · 2015Article
- 'Trust but verify'--five approaches to ensure safe medical apps.BMC medicine · 2015Article
- App Usage Factor: A Simple Metric to Compare the Population Impact of Mobile Medical Apps.Journal of medical Internet research · 2015Article
- Smartphone apps for calculating insulin dose: a systematic assessment.BMC medicine · 2015Review
- The evolution of mobile apps for asthma: an updated systematic assessment of content and tools.BMC medicine · 2015Article
- Finding a depression app: a review and content analysis of the depression app marketplace.JMIR mHealth and uHealth · 2015Review
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Comment on
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.