Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23615206›Full record

SynthesisJournal of medical Internet research2013

A new dimension of health care: systematic review of the uses, benefits, and limitations of social media for health communication.

S Anne Moorhead, Diane E Hazlett, Laura Harrison, Jennifer K Carroll, Anthea Irwin, Ciska Hoving

4 registry-linked trialsOpen access · goldAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Journal of medical Internet research, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 4 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 909 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
909citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
82.1field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04395521 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2021, after this paper: background citation

A Facebook Group-based Program for Foot Self-management Support of Adults With Diabetes Mellitus: A Feasibility Study in Canada

TypeinterventionalSponsorHelen ObilorRan2021 to 2021Enrolled32ConditionsDiabetic Foot UlcerArmsDiabetic foot self-management support
NCT06290206 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

PREVENT: Practice-based Approaches to Promote HPV Vaccination in the Safety Net - BootCamp Translation

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of UtahRan2024 to 2024Enrolled18ConditionsHPV Vaccination, Vaccine, Uptake, VaccinationArmsPREVENT - BCT
NCT06738355 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

PREVENT: Practice-based Approaches to Promote HPV Vaccination in the Safety Net - Pilot Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of UtahRan2025 to 2025Enrolled335ConditionsHPV Vaccination, Uptake Vaccination, Series CompletionArmsPREVENT
NCT07217145 phase3active not recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

PREVENT: Practice-based Approaches to Promote HPV Vaccination in the Safety Net - Randomized Controlled Trial (RCT)

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of UtahRan2025 to 2027Enrolled1,455ConditionsHPV Vaccination, Uptake Vaccination, Series CompletionArmsPREVENT
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

909 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 2,520 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. From acute care to chronic disease management: integrating physical exercise into hospital settings.International journal of qualitative studies on health and well-being · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Observational
  18. Article
  19. Content quality and reliability of mental health videos for cancer patients on social media platforms: a cross-sectional study.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026
    Article
  20. Article

849 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

S Anne MoorheadSchool of Communication, University of Ulster, Newtownabbey, Northern Ireland, United Kingdom. a.moorhead@ulster.ac.uk
Diane E Hazlett
Laura Harrison
Jennifer K Carroll
Anthea Irwin
Ciska Hoving
University of Ulster · GBMaastricht University · NLUniversity of Rochester Medical Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThere is currently a lack of information about the uses, benefits, and limitations of social media for health communication among the general public, patients, and health professionals from primary research.

objectiveTo review the current published literature to identify the uses, benefits, and limitations of social media for health communication among the general public, patients, and health professionals, and identify current gaps in the literature to provide recommendations for future health communication research.

methodsThis paper is a review using a systematic approach. A systematic search of the literature was conducted using nine electronic databases and manual searches to locate peer-reviewed studies published between January 2002 and February 2012.

resultsThe search identified 98 original research studies that included the uses, benefits, and/or limitations of social media for health communication among the general public, patients, and health professionals. The methodological quality of the studies assessed using the Downs and Black instrument was low; this was mainly due to the fact that the vast majority of the studies in this review included limited methodologies and was mainly exploratory and descriptive in nature. Seven main uses of social media for health communication were identified, including focusing on increasing interactions with others, and facilitating, sharing, and obtaining health messages. The six key overarching benefits were identified as (1) increased interactions with others, (2) more available, shared, and tailored information, (3) increased accessibility and widening access to health information, (4) peer/social/emotional support, (5) public health surveillance, and (6) potential to influence health policy. Twelve limitations were identified, primarily consisting of quality concerns and lack of reliability, confidentiality, and privacy.

conclusionsSocial media brings a new dimension to health care as it offers a medium to be used by the public, patients, and health professionals to communicate about health issues with the possibility of potentially improving health outcomes. Social media is a powerful tool, which offers collaboration between users and is a social interaction mechanism for a range of individuals. Although there are several benefits to the use of social media for health communication, the information exchanged needs to be monitored for quality and reliability, and the users' confidentiality and privacy need to be maintained. Eight gaps in the literature and key recommendations for future health communication research were provided. Examples of these recommendations include the need to determine the relative effectiveness of different types of social media for health communication using randomized control trials and to explore potential mechanisms for monitoring and enhancing the quality and reliability of health communication using social media. Further robust and comprehensive evaluation and review, using a range of methodologies, are required to establish whether social media improves health communication practice both in the short and long terms.

Indexed as

Health CommunicationSocial MediaTelemedicineHealth PersonnelHealth PromotionHumansPatient Education as TopicPublic Healthhealth communicationreviewsocial media

Identifiers

PMID23615206
PMCPMC3636326
OpenAlexW2135498674

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.