Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23614977›Full record

ArticleAutophagy2013

Lumenal peroxisomal protein aggregates are removed by concerted fission and autophagy events.

Selvambigai Manivannan, Rinse de Boer, Marten Veenhuis, Ida J van der Klei

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Autophagy, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 35 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Pexophagy: A Model for Selective Autophagy.International journal of molecular sciences · 2020
    Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Pexophagy in yeast and mammals: an update on mysteries.Histochemistry and cell biology · 2018
    Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Peroxisomes take shape.Nature reviews. Molecular cell biology · 2013
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Selvambigai ManivannanMolecular Cell Biology; University of Groningen; Groningen, The Netherlands.
Rinse de Boer
Marten Veenhuis
Ida J van der Klei
Dialyse Centrum Groningen · NLUniversity of Groningen · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We demonstrated that in the yeast Hansenula polymorpha peroxisome fission and degradation are coupled processes that are important to remove intra-organellar protein aggregates. Protein aggregates were formed in peroxisomes upon synthesis of a mutant catalase variant. We showed that the introduction of these aggregates in the peroxisomal lumen had physiological disadvantages as it affected growth and caused enhanced levels of reactive oxygen species. Formation of the protein aggregates was followed by asymmetric peroxisome fission to separate the aggregate from the mother organelle. Subsequently, these small, protein aggregate-containing organelles were degraded by autophagy. In line with this observation we showed that the degradation of the protein aggregates was strongly reduced in dnm1 and pex11 cells in which peroxisome fission is reduced. Moreover, this process was dependent on Atg1 and Atg11.

Indexed as

AutophagyProteolysisCatalaseFungal ProteinsGreen Fluorescent ProteinsMutationOxidative StressPeroxisomesPichiaProtein Structure, QuaternaryReactive Oxygen SpeciesSaccharomyces cerevisiaeCatalaseFungal ProteinsGreen Fluorescent ProteinsReactive Oxygen Speciesautophagyfissionperoxisomeprotein aggregateyeast

Identifiers

PMID23614977
PMCPMC3722314
OpenAlexW2151126546

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.